Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: drop useless mutex cs_llmq_vbc to avoid deadlock #5749

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 4, 2023

Conversation

knst
Copy link
Collaborator

@knst knst commented Dec 3, 2023

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

Missing changes in #5736
The prior backport of bitcoin#19438 has been needed to this particular changes: drop the mutex cs_llmq_vbc.

This mutex can potentially cause deadlock such as:

'cs_dip3list' in qt/masternodelist.cpp:135 (TRY) (in thread 'main')
 (2) 'cs_llmq_vbc' in llmq/utils.cpp:704 (in thread 'main')
 'm_mutex' in versionbits.cpp:253 (in thread 'main')
 (1) 'cs_main' in node/blockstorage.cpp:77 (in thread 'main')
Current lock order is:
 'cs_Shutdown' in init.cpp:220 (TRY) (in thread 'shutoff')
 (1) 'cs_main' in init.cpp:328 (in thread 'shutoff')
 (2) 'llmq::cs_llmq_vbc' in llmq/context.cpp:64 (in thread 'shutoff')

Assertion failed: detected inconsistent lock order for 'llmq::cs_llmq_vbc' in llmq/context.cpp:64 (in thread 'shutoff'), details in debug log.

What was done?

Drop cs_llmq_vbc mutex from llmq/utils

How Has This Been Tested?

Re-started app several times -> no other deadlock happens.

Breaking Changes

N/A

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

knst added 2 commits December 4, 2023 02:15
This mutex can potentially cause deadlock

'cs_dip3list' in qt/masternodelist.cpp:135 (TRY) (in thread 'main')
 (2) 'cs_llmq_vbc' in llmq/utils.cpp:704 (in thread 'main')
 'm_mutex' in versionbits.cpp:253 (in thread 'main')
 (1) 'cs_main' in node/blockstorage.cpp:77 (in thread 'main')
Current lock order is:
 'cs_Shutdown' in init.cpp:220 (TRY) (in thread 'shutoff')
 (1) 'cs_main' in init.cpp:328 (in thread 'shutoff')
 (2) 'llmq::cs_llmq_vbc' in llmq/context.cpp:64 (in thread 'shutoff')

Assertion failed: detected inconsistent lock order for 'llmq::cs_llmq_vbc' in llmq/context.cpp:64 (in thread 'shutoff'), details in debug log.
@knst knst added this to the 20.0.1 milestone Dec 3, 2023
UdjinM6
UdjinM6 previously approved these changes Dec 3, 2023
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 dismissed their stale review December 3, 2023 20:53

smth isn't right, dynamic_activation_thresholds_tests failed

Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK for squash merge

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 merged commit eb3f601 into dashpay:develop Dec 4, 2023
8 checks passed
ogabrielides pushed a commit to ogabrielides/dash that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2023
## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Missing changes in dashpay#5736
The prior backport of bitcoin#19438 has
been needed to this particular changes: drop the mutex `cs_llmq_vbc`.

This mutex can potentially cause deadlock such as:
```
'cs_dip3list' in qt/masternodelist.cpp:135 (TRY) (in thread 'main')
 (2) 'cs_llmq_vbc' in llmq/utils.cpp:704 (in thread 'main')
 'm_mutex' in versionbits.cpp:253 (in thread 'main')
 (1) 'cs_main' in node/blockstorage.cpp:77 (in thread 'main')
Current lock order is:
 'cs_Shutdown' in init.cpp:220 (TRY) (in thread 'shutoff')
 (1) 'cs_main' in init.cpp:328 (in thread 'shutoff')
 (2) 'llmq::cs_llmq_vbc' in llmq/context.cpp:64 (in thread 'shutoff')

Assertion failed: detected inconsistent lock order for 'llmq::cs_llmq_vbc' in llmq/context.cpp:64 (in thread 'shutoff'), details in debug log.
```


## What was done?
Drop `cs_llmq_vbc` mutex from llmq/utils

## How Has This Been Tested?
Re-started app several times -> no other deadlock happens.

## Breaking Changes
N/A

## Checklist:
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e
tests
- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

---------

Co-authored-by: UdjinM6 <[email protected]>
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 modified the milestones: 20.0.1, 20.0.2 Dec 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants