Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DAOS-16326 control: Update pool query UX for MD-on-SSD phase2 #14844

Merged

Conversation

tanabarr
Copy link
Contributor

@tanabarr tanabarr commented Jul 30, 2024

Display MD-on-SSD specifics on pool query including VOS index file
sizes. Tier-0 space usage reported is that of MD-on-SSD blobs and in
phase2 mode these two sizes will be distinct.

Required-githooks: true

Before requesting gatekeeper:

  • Two review approvals and any prior change requests have been resolved.
  • Testing is complete and all tests passed or there is a reason documented in the PR why it should be force landed and forced-landing tag is set.
  • Features: (or Test-tag*) commit pragma was used or there is a reason documented that there are no appropriate tags for this PR.
  • Commit messages follows the guidelines outlined here.
  • Any tests skipped by the ticket being addressed have been run and passed in the PR.

Gatekeeper:

  • You are the appropriate gatekeeper to be landing the patch.
  • The PR has 2 reviews by people familiar with the code, including appropriate owners.
  • Githooks were used. If not, request that user install them and check copyright dates.
  • Checkpatch issues are resolved. Pay particular attention to ones that will show up on future PRs.
  • All builds have passed. Check non-required builds for any new compiler warnings.
  • Sufficient testing is done. Check feature pragmas and test tags and that tests skipped for the ticket are run and now pass with the changes.
  • If applicable, the PR has addressed any potential version compatibility issues.
  • Check the target branch. If it is master branch, should the PR go to a feature branch? If it is a release branch, does it have merge approval in the JIRA ticket.
  • Extra checks if forced landing is requested
    • Review comments are sufficiently resolved, particularly by prior reviewers that requested changes.
    • No new NLT or valgrind warnings. Check the classic view.
    • Quick-build or Quick-functional is not used.
  • Fix the commit message upon landing. Check the standard here. Edit it to create a single commit. If necessary, ask submitter for a new summary.

@tanabarr tanabarr self-assigned this Jul 30, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 30, 2024

Ticket title is 'Update dmg pool query for MD-on-SSD P2'
Status is 'In Review'
Labels: 'control-plane,md_on_ssd2,usability'
https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-16326

@tanabarr tanabarr added control-plane work on the management infrastructure of the DAOS Control Plane meta-on-ssd Metadata on SSD Feature usability Changes specific to user facing tools or behaviour. labels Jul 30, 2024
@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build on Leap 15.5 with Intel-C and TARGET_PREFIX completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/1/execution/node/387/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build RPM on EL 9 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/1/execution/node/348/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build RPM on EL 8 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/1/execution/node/363/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build RPM on Leap 15.5 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/1/execution/node/273/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build DEB on Ubuntu 20.04 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/1/execution/node/313/log

@tanabarr tanabarr force-pushed the tanabarr/control-display-poolquery-mdonssd branch from 6992000 to 91a5b89 Compare August 8, 2024 11:20
@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build on Leap 15.5 with Intel-C and TARGET_PREFIX completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/2/execution/node/372/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build RPM on EL 9 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/2/execution/node/365/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build RPM on EL 8 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/2/execution/node/362/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build RPM on Leap 15.5 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/2/execution/node/334/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build DEB on Ubuntu 20.04 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/2/execution/node/361/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

@tanabarr tanabarr force-pushed the tanabarr/control-display-poolquery-mdonssd branch from 91a5b89 to 02681f6 Compare August 8, 2024 16:12
@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build on Leap 15.5 with Intel-C and TARGET_PREFIX completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/3/execution/node/372/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build RPM on EL 9 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/3/execution/node/361/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build RPM on EL 8 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/3/execution/node/355/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build RPM on Leap 15.5 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/3/execution/node/362/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Build DEB on Ubuntu 20.04 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/3/execution/node/348/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

@tanabarr tanabarr force-pushed the tanabarr/control-display-poolquery-mdonssd branch from 02681f6 to 993793f Compare August 8, 2024 17:06
@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional on EL 8.8 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/4/execution/node/1208/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional Hardware Large completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/4/execution/node/1425/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional Hardware Medium completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/4/execution/node/1526/log

@tanabarr tanabarr requested a review from sherintg August 21, 2024 22:42
@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional Hardware Large completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/8/execution/node/1417/log

Copy link
Contributor

@knard-intel knard-intel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mostly good for me.
Just one detail not preventing landing of this PR.

@@ -582,6 +582,33 @@ one 6.0 TB Ready 83%% 16%% 0/16
verbose: true,
expPrintStr: msgNoPools + "\n",
},
"verbose, two pools": {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"verbose, two pools": {
"verbose, one pool": {

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional Hardware Medium completed with status UNSTABLE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos//view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/8/testReport/

defaultTierRatios = []float64{0.06, 0.94}
defaultTierRatios = []float64{0.06, 0.94}
errPoolCreateIncompatOpts = errors.New("unsupported option combination, use (--scm-size and " +
"--nvme-size) or (--scm-size and --nvme-size) or (--size)")
Copy link
Collaborator

@sherintg sherintg Aug 23, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't this be (--scm-size and " + --nvme-size) or (--meta-size and --data-size)?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, well spotted thanks

Copy link
Contributor

@kjacque kjacque left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks okay to me outside of the issues noted by other reviewers. The issue @sherintg noted needs to be fixed.

…abarr/control-display-poolquery-mdonssd

Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Tom Nabarro <[email protected]>
Features: control pool
Allow-unstable-test: true
Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Tom Nabarro <[email protected]>
@tanabarr
Copy link
Contributor Author

functional test failures need addressing

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional Hardware Large completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/9/execution/node/1454/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional Hardware Large completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/10/execution/node/505/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional Hardware Medium completed with status UNSTABLE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos//view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/10/testReport/

…abarr/control-display-poolquery-mdonssd

Signed-off-by: Tom Nabarro <[email protected]>
Features: control pool
Allow-unstable-test: true
Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Tom Nabarro <[email protected]>
@tanabarr tanabarr requested review from a team as code owners September 4, 2024 13:58
Copy link
Contributor

@daltonbohning daltonbohning left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ftest LGTM

@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ exp_vals:
replicas: [0]
query_mask: "rebuild,space"
scm:
total: 16000008192
total: 16000000000
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this test this picky or are you just making this a clean number?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is now being specified as base-10 not base-2, I don't know whether that's a result of this PR or an existing failure on the branch. I don't have anything to compare with that is running features pool and control. I expect that it's a result of now reading the SCM quantity from meta-blob size which I imagine is specified in base-10 as its storage rather than the VOS-file size in RAM/memory which is specified in base-2.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because pool create uses scm_size: 16GB, this looks correct to me. Thanks for the explanation

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional Hardware Large completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/12/execution/node/1416/log

@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional Hardware Medium completed with status UNSTABLE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos//view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/12/testReport/

…abarr/control-display-poolquery-mdonssd

Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Tom Nabarro <[email protected]>
Features: control pool
Allow-unstable-test: true

Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Tom Nabarro <[email protected]>
@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional Hardware Large completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14844/13/execution/node/1508/log

@tanabarr tanabarr added the forced-landing The PR has known failures or has intentionally reduced testing, but should still be landed. label Sep 8, 2024
@tanabarr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tanabarr commented Sep 8, 2024

https://build.hpdd.intel.com/blue/organizations/jenkins/daos-stack%2Fdaos/detail/PR-14844/13/tests/ hardware large failed in CI due to https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-16496 related issues

Logging macro checking and Linting Summary checks fail on unchanged code

Landing to feature branch

@tanabarr tanabarr merged commit aa2cba4 into feature/vos_on_blob_p2 Sep 8, 2024
54 of 58 checks passed
@tanabarr tanabarr deleted the tanabarr/control-display-poolquery-mdonssd branch September 8, 2024 18:12
@tanabarr tanabarr changed the title DAOS-14422 control: Update pool query UX for MD-on-SSD phase2 DAOS-16326 control: Update pool query UX for MD-on-SSD phase2 Sep 8, 2024
@tanabarr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tanabarr commented Sep 8, 2024

commit title mistakenly referenced DAOS-14422 but should reference DAOS-16326

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
control-plane work on the management infrastructure of the DAOS Control Plane forced-landing The PR has known failures or has intentionally reduced testing, but should still be landed. meta-on-ssd Metadata on SSD Feature usability Changes specific to user facing tools or behaviour.
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants