Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build(deps): Bump golang.org/x/net from 0.17.0 to 0.23.0 in /src/cont… #14531

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 7, 2024

Conversation

miroslavln
Copy link

…rol (#14197)

Bumps golang.org/x/net from 0.17.0 to 0.23.0.


updated-dependencies:

  • dependency-name: golang.org/x/net dependency-type: direct:production ...

Before requesting gatekeeper:

  • Two review approvals and any prior change requests have been resolved.
  • Testing is complete and all tests passed or there is a reason documented in the PR why it should be force landed and forced-landing tag is set.
  • Features: (or Test-tag*) commit pragma was used or there is a reason documented that there are no appropriate tags for this PR.
  • Commit messages follows the guidelines outlined here.
  • Any tests skipped by the ticket being addressed have been run and passed in the PR.

Gatekeeper:

  • You are the appropriate gatekeeper to be landing the patch.
  • The PR has 2 reviews by people familiar with the code, including appropriate owners.
  • Githooks were used. If not, request that user install them and check copyright dates.
  • Checkpatch issues are resolved. Pay particular attention to ones that will show up on future PRs.
  • All builds have passed. Check non-required builds for any new compiler warnings.
  • Sufficient testing is done. Check feature pragmas and test tags and that tests skipped for the ticket are run and now pass with the changes.
  • If applicable, the PR has addressed any potential version compatibility issues.
  • Check the target branch. If it is master branch, should the PR go to a feature branch? If it is a release branch, does it have merge approval in the JIRA ticket.
  • Extra checks if forced landing is requested
    • Review comments are sufficiently resolved, particularly by prior reviewers that requested changes.
    • No new NLT or valgrind warnings. Check the classic view.
    • Quick-build or Quick-functional is not used.
  • Fix the commit message upon landing. Check the standard here. Edit it to create a single commit. If necessary, ask submitter for a new summary.

@miroslavln miroslavln requested a review from jolivier23 June 7, 2024 17:52
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 7, 2024

Bug-tracker data:
Errors are component not formatted correctly,Ticket number prefix incorrect,PR title is malformatted. See https://daosio.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DC/pages/11133911069/Commit+Comments,Unable to load ticket data
https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/Build(deps):

Copy link
Collaborator

@daosbuild1 daosbuild1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. No errors found by checkpatch.

…rol (#14197)

Bumps [golang.org/x/net](https://github.com/golang/net) from 0.17.0 to 0.23.0.
- [Commits](golang/net@v0.17.0...v0.23.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: golang.org/x/net
  dependency-type: direct:production
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Miro Nikolov <[email protected]>
@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional on EL 8.8 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com/job/daos-stack/job/daos/job/PR-14531/1/display/redirect

Copy link
Collaborator

@daosbuild1 daosbuild1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. No errors found by checkpatch.

@miroslavln miroslavln merged commit 68b0d80 into google/2.4 Jun 7, 2024
28 of 31 checks passed
@miroslavln miroslavln deleted the miro/net-ver branch June 7, 2024 20:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants