Backport two changes that can improve rebuild stability

[jolivier23]

DAOS-14010 vos: Allow rebuild overwrite (#13326)
DAOS-15670 vos: SV overwrite missed tx_add_range() (#14241)

• Partial overwrite is difficult for upper layer to avoid. If we reserve a range of minor epochs for rebuild, we can just always allow rebuild to overwrite any extents currently in the tree for the given major epoch.

• In SV overwrite case, the btr_update_record() will defer free the original record and allocate new record for record replacing, however, btr_node_tx_add() is mistakenly skipped in btr_update(), that leads to:

1. In md-on-ssd mode, tree node changes are missed in WAL.
2. In pmem mode, tree node snapshot is missed in undo log.

Before requesting gatekeeper:

• Two review approvals and any prior change requests have been resolved.
• Testing is complete and all tests passed or there is a reason documented in the PR why it should be force landed and forced-landing tag is set.
• Features: (or Test-tag*) commit pragma was used or there is a reason documented that there are no appropriate tags for this PR.
• Commit messages follows the guidelines outlined here.
• Any tests skipped by the ticket being addressed have been run and passed in the PR.

Gatekeeper:

• You are the appropriate gatekeeper to be landing the patch.
• The PR has 2 reviews by people familiar with the code, including appropriate owners.
• Githooks were used. If not, request that user install them and check copyright dates.
• Checkpatch issues are resolved. Pay particular attention to ones that will show up on future PRs.
• All builds have passed. Check non-required builds for any new compiler warnings.
• Sufficient testing is done. Check feature pragmas and test tags and that tests skipped for the ticket are run and now pass with the changes.
• If applicable, the PR has addressed any potential version compatibility issues.
• Check the target branch. If it is master branch, should the PR go to a feature branch? If it is a release branch, does it have merge approval in the JIRA ticket.
• Extra checks if forced landing is requested
  • Review comments are sufficiently resolved, particularly by prior reviewers that requested changes.
  • No new NLT or valgrind warnings. Check the classic view.
  • Quick-build or Quick-functional is not used.
• Fix the commit message upon landing. Check the standard here. Edit it to create a single commit. If necessary, ask submitter for a new summary.

[github-actions]

Bug-tracker data:
Errors are component not formatted correctly,Ticket number prefix incorrect,PR title is malformatted. See https://daosio.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DC/pages/11133911069/Commit+Comments,Unable to load ticket data
https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/Backport

[daosbuild1]

LGTM. No errors found by checkpatch.

[daosbuild1]

Test stage Build on Leap 15.5 with Intel-C and TARGET_PREFIX completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14452/1/execution/node/413/log

[daosbuild1]

Test stage Build RPM on EL 8 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14452/1/execution/node/395/log

[daosbuild1]

Test stage Build RPM on Leap 15.5 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14452/1/execution/node/398/log

[daosbuild1]

Test stage Build DEB on Ubuntu 20.04 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14452/1/execution/node/375/log

[daosbuild1]

Test stage Build on EL 8 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14452/1/execution/node/540/log

[daosbuild1]

LGTM. No errors found by checkpatch.

[daosbuild1]

LGTM. No errors found by checkpatch.