Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

moved more code into HAVE_RULES #4956

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 4, 2023
Merged

moved more code into HAVE_RULES #4956

merged 6 commits into from
May 4, 2023

Conversation

firewave
Copy link
Collaborator

@firewave firewave commented Apr 13, 2023

This was inconsistent and makes it clearer that the rules actually do nothing without having HAVE_RULES defined.

@firewave
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I removed the CI files so this does not trigger a build to ease things. So please review the individual commits as the CI changes are not visible.

@firewave firewave changed the title moved more code into `HAVE_RULES moved more code into HAVE_RULES Apr 13, 2023
@firewave firewave marked this pull request as ready for review April 14, 2023 12:24
@firewave firewave merged commit e6ae312 into danmar:main May 4, 2023
@firewave firewave deleted the rules branch May 4, 2023 08:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants