Skip to content

Update dependency @types/chrome to ^0.0.287 #226

Update dependency @types/chrome to ^0.0.287

Update dependency @types/chrome to ^0.0.287 #226

Triggered via pull request October 3, 2024 00:15
Status Failure
Total duration 29s
Artifacts

node.js.yml

on: pull_request
Matrix: build
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

3 errors and 13 warnings
build (16.x)
Process completed with exit code 1.
build (18.x)
The job was canceled because "_16_x" failed.
build (18.x)
The operation was canceled.
build (16.x)
The following actions use a deprecated Node.js version and will be forced to run on node20: actions/checkout@v3, actions/setup-node@v3. For more info: https://github.blog/changelog/2024-03-07-github-actions-all-actions-will-run-on-node20-instead-of-node16-by-default/
build (16.x): background-script.js#L107
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (16.x): background-script.js#L166
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (16.x): background-script.js#L173
["tabPosition"] is better written in dot notation
build (16.x): background-script.js#L182
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (16.x): content-script.js#L30
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (16.x): content-script.js#L31
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (18.x): background-script.js#L107
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (18.x): background-script.js#L166
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (18.x): background-script.js#L173
["tabPosition"] is better written in dot notation
build (18.x): background-script.js#L182
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (18.x): content-script.js#L30
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read
build (18.x): content-script.js#L31
Prefer using an optional chain expression instead, as it's more concise and easier to read