Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Clarify error location of inlined is predicates #5587

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jul 10, 2024

Conversation

RustanLeino
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Changes error location of x is T predicates (especially, inlined is predicates) from the x to the is.

Fixes #5586

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the MIT license.

@RustanLeino RustanLeino changed the title Issue 5586 fix: Clarify error location of inlined is predicates Jun 28, 2024
@RustanLeino RustanLeino enabled auto-merge (squash) June 28, 2024 23:24
Copy link
Member

@robin-aws robin-aws left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Definitely an improvement! How much tougher is it to identify the whole t is Class expression instead?

@RustanLeino RustanLeino merged commit 52ef046 into dafny-lang:master Jul 10, 2024
21 checks passed
@RustanLeino RustanLeino deleted the issue-5586 branch July 10, 2024 01:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bad related error location for inlined conjunct
3 participants