Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Results Panel appearance #10

Open
bdemchak opened this issue Dec 20, 2016 · 9 comments
Open

Results Panel appearance #10

bdemchak opened this issue Dec 20, 2016 · 9 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@bdemchak
Copy link
Contributor

When last I could get the Results Panel to display, the controls were present, but were not aligned, grouped, or sized so a user could readily understand the structure and function of the various options.

@keiono
Copy link
Member

keiono commented Dec 22, 2016

Added new layouts and panels to re-organize the Result panel.

@keiono keiono closed this as completed Dec 22, 2016
@bdemchak bdemchak reopened this Jan 4, 2017
@bdemchak
Copy link
Contributor Author

bdemchak commented Jan 4, 2017

The Range Column seems to affect the Heat Threshold slider ... the fact that they're so far away confuses both the understanding of this relationship and the natural workflow of using this panel. It's also unclear that default / size-rank is a style. Can we add some fixed text to clarify that ... and probably to clarify the workflow. This panel exists to seduce a neophyte user, but remains confusing. We need a much kinder touch with our easily confused and frustrated users. The entry field is synced with the slider (good!) but is outsized relative to the slider ... and it's not clear that it connects to the slider. More panel layout is necessary. Also, can slider update entry field and visual selection while slider is moving?? ... requiring a mouse-up is much less obvious and convenient to a floundering user.

@keiono
Copy link
Member

keiono commented Jan 6, 2017

I'll do some minor tweaks to the UI again.

@keiono
Copy link
Member

keiono commented Jan 7, 2017

2017-01-06 16 03 41

Updated to use two groups instead of three.

@keiono keiono added this to the Version 1.0.0 milestone Jan 9, 2017
@bdemchak
Copy link
Contributor Author

bdemchak commented Apr 5, 2017

Layout has drifted from the agreed upon format ... both grouping boxes have inappropriate bottom spacing.

@bdemchak bdemchak reopened this Apr 5, 2017
@bdemchak bdemchak modified the milestones: Version 1.2.0, Version 1.0.0 Apr 5, 2017
@keiono
Copy link
Member

keiono commented Apr 6, 2017

@bdemchak This is unclear to me. Just removed space between boxes and fixed the sub-panel sizes. Is this what you mean?

window1

@bdemchak
Copy link
Contributor Author

bdemchak commented Apr 6, 2017

Your picture is good. This is not what I see on Windows ... too much space on the upper group baseline, Too little on the lower group. Placement of groups is fine.

image

@keiono
Copy link
Member

keiono commented Apr 14, 2017

Fixed in v1.2.3.

@bdemchak
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is not fixed in Windows 10 version ... moving it to a later release.

image

@bdemchak bdemchak modified the milestones: Version 1.3.0, Version 1.2.0 Apr 14, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants