Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: [Snyk] Security upgrade vite from 2.9.15 to 2.9.16 #26925

Closed

Conversation

cypresschris
Copy link
Contributor

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `yarn` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • system-tests/projects/vite-ct-object-api/package.json
    • system-tests/projects/vite-ct-object-api/yarn.lock

Note for zero-installs users

If you are using the Yarn feature zero-installs that was introduced in Yarn V2, note that this PR does not update the .yarn/cache/ directory meaning this code cannot be pulled and immediately developed on as one would expect for a zero-install project - you will need to run yarn to update the contents of the ./yarn/cache directory.
If you are not using zero-install you can ignore this as your flow should likely be unchanged.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
high severity 768/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Path Equivalence
SNYK-JS-VITE-5664718
No Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

…ests/projects/vite-ct-object-api/yarn.lock to reduce vulnerabilities

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-VITE-5664718
@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Jun 3, 2023

27 flaky tests on run #52262 ↗︎

0 28158 1346 0 Flakiness 27

Details:

Merge branch 'develop' into snyk-fix-2daf9918a3d010be31b2eb728a88d4d8
Project: cypress Commit: acd3032635
Status: Passed Duration: 15:49 💡
Started: Nov 14, 2023 3:44 PM Ended: Nov 14, 2023 4:00 PM
Flakiness  top-nav.cy.ts • 1 flaky test • app-e2e

View
Output

Test Artifacts
... > dismisses the banner for a specified time Test Replay Screenshots
Flakiness  specs_list_latest_runs.cy.ts • 1 flaky test • app-e2e

View
Output

Test Artifacts
App/Cloud Integration - Latest runs and Average duration > when no runs are recorded > shows placeholders for all visible specs Test Replay Screenshots
Flakiness  e2e/origin/navigation.cy.ts • 1 flaky test • 5x-driver-electron

View
Output

Test Artifacts
... > establishes foobar spec bridge Test Replay
Flakiness  e2e/origin/snapshots.cy.ts • 1 flaky test • 5x-driver-electron

View
Output

Test Artifacts
cy.origin - snapshots > e2e log verification > Does not take snapshots of XHR/fetch requests from secondary origin if the wrong origin is visited / origin mismatch, but instead the primary origin (existing behavior) Test Replay
Flakiness  cypress/cypress.cy.js • 3 flaky tests • 5x-driver-electron

View
Output

Test Artifacts
... > correctly returns currentRetry Test Replay
... > correctly returns currentRetry Test Replay
... > correctly returns currentRetry Test Replay

The first 5 flaky specs are shown, see all 15 specs in Cypress Cloud.

Review all test suite changes for PR #26925 ↗︎

@jennifer-shehane jennifer-shehane changed the title [Snyk] Security upgrade vite from 2.9.15 to 2.9.16 chore: [Snyk] Security upgrade vite from 2.9.15 to 2.9.16 Mar 1, 2024
@jennifer-shehane jennifer-shehane marked this pull request as draft April 23, 2024 23:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants