Deps

[gidden]

these are all the changes I needed to make to get a fully-functional cyclus-deps conda package

[gonuke]

Maybe this just means I don't understand conda well enough, but why don't we need any of this anymore?

[gidden]

First, I think conda explicitly calls bash <script name>. Second, this was missing the shebang anyway and wouldn't have worked =/

[gonuke]

I was wondering about the whole file being deleted but just tagged it on this line.

[gidden]

Ah (it is mostly being delted, not wholy, FWIW). This looks to have been
directly copied from the cyclus conda recipe. It assumes that cyclus was
actually installed (hence playing with the executable name). Cyclus-deps
does not install cyclus.

On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Paul Wilson [email protected]
wrote:

In conda-recipes/cyclus-deps/post-link.sh
#72 (comment):

@@ -1,30 +1,3 @@
-#/bin/bash

I was wondering about the whole file being deleted but just tagged it on
this line.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/cyclus/release/pull/72/files#r31636783.

Matthew Gidden, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Associate, Nuclear Engineering
The University of Wisconsin -- Madison
Ph. 225.892.3192

[gidden]

ping

[gonuke]

What's the best way to test this?

[gidden]

Feel free to upload some conda packages
On Jun 3, 2015 9:58 PM, "Paul Wilson" [email protected] wrote:

What's the best way to test this?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#72 (comment).

[rwcarlsen]

@gidden, @gonuke - is this still relevant and up to date?

[gidden]

As of ~1 year ago, this was what I needed to do to get cyclus to install from source using conda as the dependency package manager. I thought I saw something pass the list a while ago where @scopatz had also done some work in this regard? Perhaps not.. In any case, I don't know of any reason why this wouldn't work now.

[scopatz]

I don't think it is up to date, but it is still relevant. I have been working on trying to get a cyclus conda package built via conda-forge, but cyclus has a lot of terrible dependencies (glib, etc) that make this difficult. Still hammering on it though

[rwcarlsen]

I think glib comes via libxml2 :-/ Keep us posted on any progress @scopatz.

[scopatz]

Well, glib is dependency of glibmm which is a dependency of libxml++. Currently libxml++ is building on conda-forge (finally _). All that is left before I can try a cyclus package are coin and gtest.

[gonuke]

I think this has been superseded by other activity by @bam241 on conda/conda-forge