provider: Skip unimported resources #191
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
xescugc
force-pushed
the
fg-not-importable
branch
2 times, most recently
from
85a60ed to
a064f2a
Compare
If a resources we include is not Importable from the provider it was causing issues when used with CTY. With this fix they are no longer an issue. This was potentially caused also if the Provider decided to not support importing a resource that they use to on the past and we have it on the list
xescugc
force-pushed
the
fg-not-importable
branch
from
a064f2a to
8dfc15c
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If a resources we include is not Importable from the provider it was causing issues when used with CTY. With
this fix they are no longer an issue. This was potentially caused also if the Provider decided to not support
importing a resource that they use to on the past and we have it on the list.
Also regenerated code.
I've noticed the issue while testing #186 which was failing as we need to convert thing around with the new format. To keep that PR clean I opened this small one to fix this and then rebase the other with the fix.