Allow pending to be used without blocks
#6732
Conversation
Both `it` and `pending` can be used in RSpec without a block. Calling `it` without a block is a way of specifying that it is pending. I was caught off guard when writing a spec and it failed in both instances because I lacked a block.
|
|
|
Is the |
|
it is an alias |
I'm pulling these at the request of @asterite. Doesn't really make sense to have them here as there's no way other than manual verification to ensure that they have the intended behavior.
|
@straight-shoota, @RX14 the documented way to mark tests as incomplete in RSpec is to write |
|
Yes, but this is not RSpec and Crystal tries to avoid aliases. I guess anyone will be surprised to find out there's no let, before each, etc. |
|
In fairness, @asterite – when I came across no I'll remove the new |
Summerizing here: Crystal's Spec isn't RSpec. There's enough slight changes that having to write `pending` without a block won't be a huge deal.
bcardiff
changed the title
it and pending to be used without blockspending to be used without blocks
Both
itandpendingcan be used in RSpec without a block. Callingitwithout a block is a way of specifying that it is pending. I was caught off guard when writing a spec and it failed in both instances because I lacked a block.