Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade internal bitcoind version #1173

Merged

Conversation

ben-kaufman
Copy link
Contributor

Update the packaged bitcoind version to 0.21.1 and add an upgrade mechanism for this and future updates

('./bitcoind/bitcoin-0.21.0-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz', 'bitcoind'),
('./bitcoind/bitcoin-0.21.0-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz', 'bitcoind'),
('./bitcoind/bitcoin-0.21.1-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz', 'bitcoind'),
('./bitcoind/bitcoin-0.21.1-arm-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz', 'bitcoind'),
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we could package only one version of bitcoin core here depending on platform.processor()

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But then we'll have to make 2 different Linux builds on 2 different Linux machines.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But we need to do it anyway. Currently we release only for x86_64, for arm we need another build machine

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right, my bad. I'll update it

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

@stepansnigirev stepansnigirev merged commit 2d89b54 into cryptoadvance:master May 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants