Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: unusual date format in response #292

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

yevheniyJ
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 72.72727% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 93.72%. Comparing base (5d164ed) to head (a3f8016).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...n/client/core/http/impl/json/DateDeserializer.java 70.00% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #292      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     93.81%   93.72%   -0.09%     
- Complexity      760      762       +2     
============================================
  Files           186      187       +1     
  Lines          2486     2497      +11     
  Branches         52       53       +1     
============================================
+ Hits           2332     2340       +8     
- Misses          130      132       +2     
- Partials         24       25       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@yevheniyJ yevheniyJ merged commit 5b644e4 into master Nov 12, 2024
3 checks passed
@yevheniyJ yevheniyJ deleted the fix-date-field-parse branch November 12, 2024 18:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants