Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: implement required
FungibleTokenPacketData
v3 interface methods #6126chore: implement required
FungibleTokenPacketData
v3 interface methods #6126Changes from 34 commits
dbe408a
845b269
69b2643
8f4eaaa
d8bfd45
e32a13d
e1b52c3
0e0e478
00e6c10
8b5eb77
62d76e9
2cc1804
4b42e80
3da8e01
dee5a30
f7e5792
bd34b69
880b24d
8cad136
5ebba40
867746f
24ed388
a666243
a85fa71
e10863e
81c4d50
15d949f
555d2f2
3b421b3
3f87adf
aa33c88
06ff045
1f6c780
bae7e4f
fa6c1ce
8cb5d19
3669a6c
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are you joining them just to split them again? I think the reason is that the list looks like:
["channel-0/transfer", "channel-120/transfer"]
. However, I still think we should do this in a cleaner way if possible such as usingslices
or maybe just modifyingValidateTraceIdentifiers
to accept this formatThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd rather avoid modifying
ValidateTraceIdentifiers
since that is being used by bothDenomTrace.Validate()
andValidatePrefixedDenom()
on the fungible token packet data v1, and the idea is that both v2 and v1 could use this function, without having to refactor the logic on those functions as well (for now). Potentially that refactor can be another issue later down the road. I can check out how to implement using slices.