Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Address linter issues in e2e/ #6115

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Apr 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

bznein
Copy link
Contributor

@bznein bznein commented Apr 8, 2024

Description

Addresses linting issues (mostly unchecked type assertions) in e2e.

Upgrading to a newer version of the linter must be done at the very end since it raises hundreds of errors.
I am going to incrementally address them and only upgrade the version when they are all solved.

ref: #6086


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against the correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md).
  • Linked to GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design, OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards and Go style guide.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests.
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/).
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Provide a conventional commit message to follow the repository standards.
  • Include a descriptive changelog entry when appropriate. This may be left to the discretion of the PR reviewers. (e.g. chores should be omitted from changelog)
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the GitHub PR explorer.
  • Review SonarCloud Report in the comment section below once CI passes.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved type safety in various test suites by adding type assertion checks.
    • Updated import paths for enhanced project structure.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Fixed potential issues in handling type conversions and assertions to prevent runtime errors.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent updates enhance type safety across various test suites, introducing checks for type assertions to prevent runtime errors. Modifications include ensuring the correct type before accessing fields or proceeding with logic, and adjusting import paths to reflect structural changes. This collective effort aims to solidify the codebase's robustness, making it more reliable and easier to maintain.

Changes

Files Summary
.../02-client/client_test.go
.../transfer/localhost_test.go
.../wasm/grandpa_test.go
Added type assertion checks with ok variable to ensure type safety before accessing fields or proceeding with logic.
.../upgrades/genesis_test.go Updated the import path for the cosmos package.
.../testsuite/testconfig.go Implemented checks and conversion for ibcGenesisMap["channel_genesis"] into a map type, handling conversion failures and modifying the map before marshaling.

🐰✨

In the realm of code, where logic threads intertwine,
A rabbit hopped through, making type checks align.
With a flick and a hop, errors start to decline,
Paths corrected, safety ensured, all by design.
Celebrate we shall, for the code now shines fine!
🌟🐇

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 65f0ec7 and b6cf3cc.
Files selected for processing (5)
  • e2e/tests/core/02-client/client_test.go (1 hunks)
  • e2e/tests/transfer/localhost_test.go (1 hunks)
  • e2e/tests/upgrades/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
  • e2e/tests/wasm/grandpa_test.go (5 hunks)
  • e2e/testsuite/testconfig.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (7)
e2e/tests/upgrades/genesis_test.go (1)

12-12: Updated import path for consistency.

This change aligns with the objective of updating the import path to reflect changes in dependency structure or location. Ensure that all references to the old path are updated accordingly to avoid import errors.

e2e/testsuite/testconfig.go (1)

744-747: Properly handling type assertion to enhance type safety.
The implementation correctly checks the type assertion result with an ok variable before proceeding, which is a best practice in Go to prevent runtime panics from incorrect type assumptions. This change aligns with the PR's objectives of addressing linting issues and enhancing type safety.

e2e/tests/wasm/grandpa_test.go (5)

81-85: Correctly implemented boolean checks for type assertions enhance type safety.


236-240: Correctly implemented boolean checks for type assertions enhance type safety.


353-357: Correctly implemented boolean checks for type assertions enhance type safety.


443-447: Correctly implemented boolean checks for type assertions enhance type safety.


538-542: Correctly implemented boolean checks for type assertions enhance type safety.

e2e/tests/transfer/localhost_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
e2e/tests/core/02-client/client_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on all these listing fixes, @bznein. :)

e2e/testsuite/testconfig.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm!

@DimitrisJim DimitrisJim merged commit c669ce6 into cosmos:main Apr 9, 2024
79 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants