-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 648
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement MsgChannelUpgradeCancel message server handler #3848
Changes from 34 commits
5cd004e
cbc8e32
d01355f
6f7940b
6d50848
795cd05
dfbc5d4
b2a99ca
d429514
4330c51
c1e05b8
619381b
91605c1
d050ee8
eaa2b91
d6bd3bf
cfe59ae
7d2c3d4
099b147
759474f
3916332
700acba
6b2ce2e
811c418
0f0305f
d6bd69c
51e9070
3e0bf6e
4e12bc0
df123ba
098d0a3
853eae2
c2ae441
85afe0f
8ced59b
bf10856
0e34c52
8405547
fb3897c
2f540ce
f470ffd
78fb32b
1550e6f
ffc1b6f
415e66a
cc8cb48
8ffceb8
269d9e0
2717582
51335bd
d023ac0
04ac212
a3bbf80
8c58850
6f9f680
c36673a
0748052
cc45fe5
f2782b3
95c97db
0f3bc84
fa56a67
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -63,4 +63,4 @@ linters-settings: | |
revive: | ||
rules: | ||
- name: if-return | ||
disabled: true | ||
disabled: true |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -820,5 +820,33 @@ func (k Keeper) ChannelUpgradeTimeout(goCtx context.Context, msg *channeltypes.M | |||||
|
||||||
// ChannelUpgradeCancel defines a rpc handler method for MsgChannelUpgradeCancel. | ||||||
func (k Keeper) ChannelUpgradeCancel(goCtx context.Context, msg *channeltypes.MsgChannelUpgradeCancel) (*channeltypes.MsgChannelUpgradeCancelResponse, error) { | ||||||
return nil, nil | ||||||
ctx := sdk.UnwrapSDKContext(goCtx) | ||||||
|
||||||
module, _, err := k.ChannelKeeper.LookupModuleByChannel(ctx, msg.PortId, msg.ChannelId) | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. we should add a testcase for module not found here I think! |
||||||
if err != nil { | ||||||
ctx.Logger().Error("channel upgrade cancel failed", "port-id", msg.PortId, "error", errorsmod.Wrap(err, "could not retrieve module from port-id")) | ||||||
return nil, errorsmod.Wrap(err, "could not retrieve module from port-id") | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
cbs, ok := k.Router.GetRoute(module) | ||||||
if !ok { | ||||||
ctx.Logger().Error("channel upgrade cancel failed", "port-id", msg.PortId, "error", errorsmod.Wrapf(porttypes.ErrInvalidRoute, "route not found to module: %s", module)) | ||||||
return nil, errorsmod.Wrapf(porttypes.ErrInvalidRoute, "route not found to module: %s", module) | ||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
if err := k.ChannelKeeper.ChanUpgradeCancel(ctx, msg.PortId, msg.ChannelId, msg.ErrorReceipt, msg.ProofErrorReceipt, msg.ProofHeight); err != nil { | ||||||
ctx.Logger().Error("channel upgrade cancel failed", "port-id", msg.PortId, "error", err.Error()) | ||||||
return nil, err | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
if err := cbs.OnChanUpgradeRestore(ctx, msg.PortId, msg.ChannelId); err != nil { | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Sorry if I missed the discussing about the naming, but what about There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. i think it makes more sense for the applications to call a |
||||||
ctx.Logger().Error("channel upgrade cancel failed", "port-id", msg.PortId, "error", err.Error()) | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Might not be consistent in the other upgrade handshake handlers, but this would make it more consistent with the open handshake handlers:
Suggested change
|
||||||
return nil, err | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Also for consistency:
Suggested change
|
||||||
} | ||||||
|
||||||
k.ChannelKeeper.WriteUpgradeCancelChannel(ctx, msg.PortId, msg.ChannelId) | ||||||
|
||||||
ctx.Logger().Info("channel upgrade cancel succeeded", "port-id", msg.PortId, "channel-id", msg.ChannelId) | ||||||
|
||||||
return &channeltypes.MsgChannelUpgradeCancelResponse{}, nil | ||||||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: