-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 623
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
imp: represent unlimited approvals with MaxUint256 value #3454
imp: represent unlimited approvals with MaxUint256 value #3454
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR @Vvaradinov!
My concern about giving a special value to nil here means that it because easier to accidentally configure unlimited spending if the field is omitted.
I think I would lean towards creating a named sentinel value to pass in explicitly as the SpendLimit.
e.g.
allocation.SpendLimit = UnlimitedSpending()
What do you think?
I agree with the risk described above by @chatton. And besides that, and after discussing also with @womensrights, we think that it is risky to not specify the unlimited spending for a particular denomination. With the approach of using |
…/Vvaradinov/ibc-go into Vvaradinov/ics20-unlimited-authz
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3454 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 78.79% 78.79%
=======================================
Files 182 182
Lines 12683 12688 +5
=======================================
+ Hits 9993 9998 +5
Misses 2258 2258
Partials 432 432
|
Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]>
Looks like some unit test is failing 👀 Will take a closer look later today |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK! Great work @Vvaradinov
Thanks for all the work on this one, @Vvaradinov! I opened a PR with an idea suggested by @damiannolan and @colin-axner (making |
review feedback
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK, thanks @crodriguezvega
Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK. Thanks a lot for all this work, @Vvaradinov!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK. Thanks a lot for all this work, @Vvaradinov!
* imp: represent unlimited approvals with a nil value * CHANGELOG * Update CHANGELOG.md * fix: updated unlimited spending limit to be represented with the MaxInt64 * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> * Update CHANGELOG.md Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> * fix: lint * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go * fix: update failing test and add test case suggested in review * fix: moved isAllowedAddress check before coin loop * fix: use maxUint256 case so it aligns with what's being passed from the EVM extension * refactor transfer authz to remove coins iteration in favour of explicit amount checking * make format * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> * fix: add the Authorization to Updated. * moving allowlist check to before spend limit logic * Apply suggestions from code review * fix: add comment to spend limit check * review feedback * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> * Update docs/apps/transfer/authorizations.md * fix: changed to new sentinel value name --------- Co-authored-by: Carlos Rodriguez <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 7e6eb4c) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md # e2e/tests/core/client_test.go # e2e/testsuite/grpc_query.go # modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go # modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization_test.go
* imp: represent unlimited approvals with a nil value * CHANGELOG * Update CHANGELOG.md * fix: updated unlimited spending limit to be represented with the MaxInt64 * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> * Update CHANGELOG.md Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> * fix: lint * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go * fix: update failing test and add test case suggested in review * fix: moved isAllowedAddress check before coin loop * fix: use maxUint256 case so it aligns with what's being passed from the EVM extension * refactor transfer authz to remove coins iteration in favour of explicit amount checking * make format * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> * fix: add the Authorization to Updated. * moving allowlist check to before spend limit logic * Apply suggestions from code review * fix: add comment to spend limit check * review feedback * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> * Update docs/apps/transfer/authorizations.md * fix: changed to new sentinel value name --------- Co-authored-by: Carlos Rodriguez <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 7e6eb4c) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md # e2e/tests/core/client_test.go # e2e/testsuite/grpc_query.go # modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go
) (#3580) * imp: represent unlimited approvals with MaxUint256 value (#3454) * imp: represent unlimited approvals with a nil value * CHANGELOG * Update CHANGELOG.md * fix: updated unlimited spending limit to be represented with the MaxInt64 * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> * Update CHANGELOG.md Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> * fix: lint * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go * fix: update failing test and add test case suggested in review * fix: moved isAllowedAddress check before coin loop * fix: use maxUint256 case so it aligns with what's being passed from the EVM extension * refactor transfer authz to remove coins iteration in favour of explicit amount checking * make format * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> * fix: add the Authorization to Updated. * moving allowlist check to before spend limit logic * Apply suggestions from code review * fix: add comment to spend limit check * review feedback * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> * Update docs/apps/transfer/authorizations.md * fix: changed to new sentinel value name --------- Co-authored-by: Carlos Rodriguez <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 7e6eb4c) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md # e2e/tests/core/client_test.go # e2e/testsuite/grpc_query.go # modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go # modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization_test.go * resolving conflicts --------- Co-authored-by: Vladislav Varadinov <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]>
) (#3581) * imp: represent unlimited approvals with MaxUint256 value (#3454) * imp: represent unlimited approvals with a nil value * CHANGELOG * Update CHANGELOG.md * fix: updated unlimited spending limit to be represented with the MaxInt64 * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> * Update CHANGELOG.md Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> * fix: lint * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go * fix: update failing test and add test case suggested in review * fix: moved isAllowedAddress check before coin loop * fix: use maxUint256 case so it aligns with what's being passed from the EVM extension * refactor transfer authz to remove coins iteration in favour of explicit amount checking * make format * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> * fix: add the Authorization to Updated. * moving allowlist check to before spend limit logic * Apply suggestions from code review * fix: add comment to spend limit check * review feedback * Update modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> * Update docs/apps/transfer/authorizations.md * fix: changed to new sentinel value name --------- Co-authored-by: Carlos Rodriguez <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Federico Kunze Küllmer <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 7e6eb4c) # Conflicts: # CHANGELOG.md # e2e/tests/core/client_test.go # e2e/testsuite/grpc_query.go # modules/apps/transfer/types/transfer_authorization.go * resolving conflicts --------- Co-authored-by: Vladislav Varadinov <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Damian Nolan <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice work :) just left a small note on the updated return value
@@ -36,6 +40,10 @@ func (a TransferAuthorization) Accept(ctx sdk.Context, msg sdk.Msg) (authz.Accep | |||
continue | |||
} | |||
|
|||
if allocation.SpendLimit.AmountOf(msgTransfer.Token.Denom).Equal(sdk.NewIntFromBigInt(MaxUint256)) { | |||
return authz.AcceptResponse{Accept: true, Delete: false, Updated: &a}, nil |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think updated being nil is useful for two reasons:
- readability, in this situation no update should occur to the allocations (no undesired sideaffects, removes possibility of buggy code from causing issues)
- less gas costs (returning an updated value causes kv store read/writes)
Is it not possible to update the tests?
@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ package types_test | |||
import ( | |||
sdk "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types" | |||
"github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/x/authz" | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: import formatting
Description
This PR implements the changes proposed in #3452
closes: #3452
Commit Message / Changelog Entry
imp(statemachine)!: represent unlimited approvals with a the MaxInt256 value
see the guidelines for commit messages. (view raw markdown for examples)
Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.
docs/
) or specification (x/<module>/spec/
).godoc
comments.Files changed
in the Github PR explorer.Codecov Report
in the comment section below once CI passes.