Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

47 uptodate #2699

Closed
wants to merge 13 commits into from
Closed

47 uptodate #2699

wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

faddat
Copy link
Contributor

@faddat faddat commented Nov 8, 2022

Description

Draft of 47 that is a bit more bumped.

Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes

@faddat faddat marked this pull request as draft November 8, 2022 01:40
app.AccountKeeper = authkeeper.NewAccountKeeper(
appCodec, keys[authtypes.StoreKey], app.GetSubspace(authtypes.ModuleName), authtypes.ProtoBaseAccount, maccPerms, sdk.GetConfig().GetBech32AccountAddrPrefix(),
)
app.AccountKeeper = authkeeper.NewAccountKeeper(appCodec, keys[authtypes.StoreKey], authtypes.ProtoBaseAccount, maccPerms, sdk.Bech32MainPrefix, authtypes.NewModuleAddress(govtypes.ModuleName).String())

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Directly using the bech32 constants

Directly using the bech32 constants instead of the configuration values
@crodriguezvega
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @faddat, thanks for helping us with the SDK bump. This is now the third PR to bump the SDK :) @tac0turtle also opened a PR last week for this work. I would suggest that we try to concentrate efforts on that one, so please have a look and try to contribute by opening PRs against that branch to move the work forward. If that sounds ok to you, then I will close this PR and also this one.

@faddat
Copy link
Contributor Author

faddat commented Nov 14, 2022

totally great sir!

@faddat faddat closed this Nov 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants