Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

revised docs for cli.go #22665

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

revised docs for cli.go #22665

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

johson-ll
Copy link
Contributor

@johson-ll johson-ll commented Nov 27, 2024

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced commands for executing state transitions and querying account states in the CLI for account management.
    • Added methods for coin transfer, multi-send, and burning coins in the bank module, enhancing transaction capabilities.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for coin-related operations, ensuring better validation and user feedback.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces enhancements to the command-line interface (CLI) for account management and adds new methods to the msgServer struct in the banking module. Two new CLI commands, GetExecuteCmd and GetQueryAccountCmd, allow for executing state transitions and querying account states, respectively. In the banking module, new methods for sending, multi-sending, and burning coins are added, enhancing transaction handling capabilities. These changes improve the overall functionality of the CLI and the banking module while maintaining existing structures and error handling.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
x/accounts/cli/cli.go - Added GetExecuteCmd() for executing state transitions on accounts.
- Added GetQueryAccountCmd() for querying account states.
x/bank/keeper/msg_server.go - Added Send(ctx, msg) for transferring coins.
- Added MultiSend(ctx, msg) for multiple outputs in a transaction.
- Added Burn(ctx, msg) for burning coins.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

C:x/bank

Suggested reviewers

  • akhilkumarpilli
  • julienrbrt
  • tac0turtle
  • testinginprod

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
x/bank/keeper/msg_server.go (4)

Line range hint 32-48: Refactor address conversion to reduce code duplication

The address conversion and type assertion are performed multiple times across methods. Consider refactoring this logic into a helper function to enhance maintainability and readability.

Example refactor:

func (k msgServer) convertAddress(addrStr string) ([]byte, error) {
    base, ok := k.Keeper.(BaseKeeper)
    if !ok {
        return nil, sdkerrors.ErrInvalidRequest.Wrapf("invalid keeper type: %T", k.Keeper)
    }
    addr, err := base.addrCdc.StringToBytes(addrStr)
    if err != nil {
        return nil, sdkerrors.ErrInvalidAddress.Wrapf("invalid address: %s", err)
    }
    return addr, nil
}

Usage in the Send method:

from, err = k.convertAddress(msg.FromAddress)
if err != nil {
    return nil, err
}
to, err = k.convertAddress(msg.ToAddress)
if err != nil {
    return nil, err
}

Line range hint 70-112: Clarify and enhance input handling in MultiSend method

The MultiSend method currently restricts the inputs to a single sender. If supporting multiple senders is planned for future releases, consider implementing that functionality now. Otherwise, update the error messages and documentation to clearly reflect this limitation.

Additionally, the repeated type assertion and address conversion for each output can be refactored using the previously suggested helper function to reduce code duplication.


Line range hint 168-183: Simplify coin accumulation by utilizing sdk.Coins directly

In the Burn method, the loop used for accumulating coins can be replaced with a direct assignment since msg.Amount is already of type sdk.Coins. This change improves readability and efficiency.

Apply this diff to simplify the coin accumulation:

-    var coins sdk.Coins
-    for _, coin := range msg.Amount {
-        coins = coins.Add(sdk.NewCoin(coin.Denom, coin.Amount))
-    }
+    coins := sdk.NewCoins(msg.Amount...)

Line range hint 173-183: Refactor address conversion to maintain consistency

As in other methods, refactor the address conversion in the Burn method to use the helper function. This ensures consistency across the codebase and reduces repetition.

Updated code using the helper function:

from, err = k.convertAddress(msg.FromAddress)
if err != nil {
    return nil, err
}
x/accounts/cli/cli.go (5)

98-98: Run gofumpt -extra to format the code according to style guidelines

The code at the specified lines is not formatted according to gofumpt with the -extra flag. Running gofumpt -extra will ensure consistent code formatting as per Go standards.

Also applies to: 105-105, 147-147, 154-154, 176-176, 194-194

🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)

98-98: File is not gofumpt-ed with -extra

(gofumpt)


102-102: Organize imports using gci for better readability

The file imports are not organized according to gci with the provided configuration. Please run gci to sort and group the imports properly, enhancing code readability and maintainability.

Also applies to: 125-125, 168-168, 177-177, 195-195

🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)

102-102: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order

(gci)


Line range hint 203-203: Avoid including unvalidated user input in error messages to prevent sensitive data leakage

Including jsonMsg, which may contain untrusted user-provided data, in the error message could lead to exposure of sensitive information. It's advisable to remove jsonMsg from the error to mitigate potential security risks.

Apply this diff to modify the error message:

-    return nil, fmt.Errorf("provided message is not valid %s: %w", jsonMsg, err)
+    return nil, fmt.Errorf("provided message is not valid: %w", err)
🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)

102-102: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order

(gci)


125-125: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order

(gci)


98-98: File is not gofumpt-ed with -extra

(gofumpt)


105-105: File is not gofumpt-ed with -extra

(gofumpt)


101-103: Enhance command usage instructions for better user guidance

Consider providing more detailed usage instructions or examples in the Use field to improve user experience. Clearly specifying the expected formats for <account-address>, <execute-msg-type-url>, and <json-message> can help users execute the command correctly.

🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)

102-102: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order

(gci)


Line range hint 195-204: Handle potential nil pointer dereference in encodeJSONToProto

When creating a new message instance, ensure that impl.Elem() is not nil to prevent a possible nil pointer dereference. Adding a nil check before proceeding can enhance code robustness.

Apply this diff to add a nil check:

 func encodeJSONToProto(name, jsonMsg string) (*codectypes.Any, error) {
     impl := gogoproto.MessageType(name)
     if impl == nil {
         return nil, fmt.Errorf("message type %s not found", name)
     }
+    if impl.Elem() == nil {
+        return nil, fmt.Errorf("message type %s has no element type", name)
+    }
     msg := reflect.New(impl.Elem()).Interface().(gogoproto.Message)
     err := jsonpb.Unmarshal(bytes.NewBufferString(jsonMsg), msg)
     if err != nil {
         return nil, fmt.Errorf("provided message is not valid: %w", err)
     }
     return codectypes.NewAnyWithValue(msg)
 }
🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)

195-195: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order

(gci)


194-194: File is not gofumpt-ed with -extra

(gofumpt)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f296a50 and def4bc9.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • x/accounts/cli/cli.go (3 hunks)
  • x/bank/keeper/msg_server.go (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
x/accounts/cli/cli.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

x/bank/keeper/msg_server.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)
x/accounts/cli/cli.go

102-102: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order

(gci)


125-125: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order

(gci)


98-98: File is not gofumpt-ed with -extra

(gofumpt)


105-105: File is not gofumpt-ed with -extra

(gofumpt)


168-168: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order

(gci)


177-177: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order

(gci)


147-147: File is not gofumpt-ed with -extra

(gofumpt)


154-154: File is not gofumpt-ed with -extra

(gofumpt)


176-176: File is not gofumpt-ed with -extra

(gofumpt)


195-195: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order

(gci)


194-194: File is not gofumpt-ed with -extra

(gofumpt)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
x/bank/keeper/msg_server.go (1)

Line range hint 25-66: Code is well-implemented and follows best practices

The Send method correctly handles the transfer of coins between accounts, with appropriate validations and error handling. The control flow is clear, and the method adheres to the expected logic for sending coins.

x/accounts/cli/cli.go (2)

Line range hint 96-142: Code conforms to best practices and styles

The implementation of GetExecuteCmd is clear, and error handling is appropriately managed. The function follows Go conventions and integrates well with the Cobra command structure.

🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint (1.62.2)

102-102: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order

(gci)


125-125: File is not gci-ed with --skip-generated -s standard -s default -s prefix(cosmossdk.io) -s prefix(github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk) --custom-order

(gci)


98-98: File is not gofumpt-ed with -extra

(gofumpt)


105-105: File is not gofumpt-ed with -extra

(gofumpt)


112-115: Verify address conversion for correct encoding

Ensure that using clientCtx.AddressCodec.BytesToString on clientCtx.GetFromAddress() correctly converts the address to the desired string format. This verification is crucial to prevent potential issues with address encoding and transaction signing.

Run the following script to confirm the address conversion:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can see that clientCtx.AddressCodec.BytesToString(clientCtx.GetFromAddress()) is a commonly used pattern throughout the codebase for converting addresses between bytes and string representations. The pattern is used consistently in various modules (authz, staking, params, feegrant, group, gov, distribution, etc.) and follows the standard address encoding practices.

Address conversion is correctly implemented

The code follows the established pattern where:

  1. GetFromAddress() returns the bytes representation of the address
  2. AddressCodec.BytesToString() converts it to the appropriate string format
  3. Error handling is properly implemented for the conversion
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the address conversion method.

# Test: Check if GetFromAddress returns bytes compatible with AddressCodec.BytesToString
grep -rn 'GetFromAddress' x/accounts/cli/cli.go
grep -rn 'AddressCodec.BytesToString' x/accounts/cli/cli.go

Length of output: 453


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the implementation and usage of AddressCodec and GetFromAddress

# Check the type definition and implementation of clientCtx
rg -A 5 "type Client" --glob "*.go"

# Check where AddressCodec is defined and how it's used
rg "AddressCodec" --glob "*.go" -A 3

# Look for any tests related to address conversion
rg "TestAddress" --glob "*_test.go" -A 5

Length of output: 100370


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the address codec implementation and usage

# Check the implementation of AddressCodec in the client context
rg -A 5 "type ClientContext" --glob "*.go"

# Check where GetFromAddress is defined and its implementation
rg -A 5 "GetFromAddress" --glob "*.go"

# Look for any tests related to address conversion
rg "TestAddress.*conversion|TestBytesToString|TestStringToBytes" --glob "*_test.go"

Length of output: 10039

@julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

Hi! Thanks for your PR, however those comments do not add anything to the code, and actually makes it less readable.
Contributions on docs are the most welcome, so thanks for that. Feel free to have a look here: T:Docs Changes and features related to documentation. for idea of what should be better documented.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt closed this Nov 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants