Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: update missing wrong cometbft prefixdb links #22173

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

tutufen
Copy link
Contributor

@tutufen tutufen commented Oct 8, 2024

Description

Ref #22166

I found a wrong cometbft prefixdb link in store_test.go, missed to update this link in the last PR...

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Updated test cases for prefix stores to ensure comprehensive coverage of key-value operations and iterator behaviors.
    • Renamed source of tests to reflect changes in repository version while maintaining existing test logic.

@tutufen tutufen requested review from cool-develope, kocubinski and a team as code owners October 8, 2024 15:11
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 8, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the testing of prefix stores within the store/prefix/store_test.go file. The primary modification involves updating the source references of ported tests from one GitHub repository version to another. While the test logic and structure remain largely unchanged, the tests continue to validate various scenarios for prefix stores, including key-value operations and iterator behavior.

Changes

File Change Summary
store/prefix/store_test.go Updated source references for ported tests; no changes to test logic or structure.

Possibly related PRs

  • docs: update cometbft db code reference link #22166: This PR updates documentation links related to the cometbft database code, which may be relevant to the testing of prefix stores as it involves the same prefix store functionality in the store/prefix directory.

Suggested labels

C:Store, backport/v0.52.x

Suggested reviewers

  • kocubinski
  • testinginprod
  • julienrbrt

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5fea67d and 40af2db.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • store/prefix/store_test.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • store/prefix/store_test.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 8, 2024
Merged via the queue into cosmos:main with commit 325728a Oct 8, 2024
74 of 82 checks passed
@tutufen tutufen deleted the fix/prefixdb-doc branch October 9, 2024 02:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants