-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(ve): Ensure that sdk side ve math matches cometbft
#19200
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update has simplified the vote validation process by eliminating the global Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Sets the quorum threshold to be consistent with comet https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/blob/ec3d9f6ba24f07bd4a9ebf040a61ae21dd8cf72d/types/vote_set.go#L307 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
baseapp/abci_utils.go
Outdated
return fmt.Errorf("insufficient cumulative voting power received to verify vote extensions; got: %s, expected: >=%s", percentSubmitted, VoteExtensionThreshold) | ||
} | ||
// If the sum of the voting power has not reached (2/3 + 1) we need to error. | ||
if sumVP < (totalVP*2/3)+1 { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: we could check that totalVP > 0
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approving with a slight bit of hesitation 😆
@alexanderbez fixed a couple nits, also can we backport into 50? |
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
Yes, absolutely. |
@itsdevbear there's one failing test -- |
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!
in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.md
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...