Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: check for nil params #18041

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 11, 2023
Merged

chore: check for nil params #18041

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 11, 2023

Conversation

tac0turtle
Copy link
Member

Description

A40

check for nil params


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • run make lint and make test
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

@tac0turtle tac0turtle requested a review from a team as a code owner October 10, 2023 12:59
@tac0turtle tac0turtle added backport/v0.47.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.47's next stable release backport/v0.50.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.50's next stable release labels Oct 10, 2023
@github-prbot github-prbot requested review from a team, facundomedica and samricotta and removed request for a team October 10, 2023 13:00
Copy link
Contributor

@testinginprod testinginprod left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@@ -175,6 +175,17 @@ func (s *KeeperTestSuite) TestUpdateParams() {
expErr: true,
expErrMsg: "invalid authority",
},
{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should also add the unit tests if any of block, validator is missing.

return cmtproto.ConsensusParams{}, errors.New("all parameters must be present")
}

fmt.Println(msg.Evidence)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
fmt.Println(msg.Evidence)

@@ -9,7 +12,13 @@ import (

var _ sdk.Msg = &MsgUpdateParams{}

func (msg MsgUpdateParams) ToProtoConsensusParams() cmtproto.ConsensusParams {
func (msg MsgUpdateParams) ToProtoConsensusParams() (cmtproto.ConsensusParams, error) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can this be a api breaking change?

@tac0turtle tac0turtle enabled auto-merge October 11, 2023 09:06
Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm! but the backported PR to v0.47 should not be api breaking.

@tac0turtle tac0turtle added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 11, 2023
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 11, 2023
@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 11, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit ed14ec0 Oct 11, 2023
48 of 50 checks passed
@julienrbrt julienrbrt deleted the marko/40 branch October 11, 2023 10:22
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2023
Co-authored-by: atheeshp <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit ed14ec0)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2023
Co-authored-by: atheeshp <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit ed14ec0)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	x/consensus/keeper/keeper.go
#	x/consensus/keeper/keeper_test.go
#	x/consensus/types/msgs.go
julienrbrt added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2023
julienrbrt pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2023
@faddat faddat mentioned this pull request Mar 20, 2024
12 tasks
@faddat faddat mentioned this pull request Nov 8, 2024
12 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/v0.47.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.47's next stable release backport/v0.50.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.50's next stable release C:x/consensus
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants