feat(x/feegrant): feegrant autcli module query

[JeancarloBarrios]

Description

Closes: #16215 16215

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title
• added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• followed the guidelines for building modules
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
• included comments for documenting Go code
• updated the relevant documentation or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic
• reviewed API design and naming
• reviewed documentation is accurate
• reviewed tests and test coverage
• manually tested (if applicable)

[github-actions]

@JeancarloBarrios your pull request is missing a changelog!

[aaronc]

When removing end to end tests I would want to make sure that there are existing unit tests which cover this logic or add them

[tac0turtle]

tested, the ux looks the same. The open question about the tests is the only thing that is open. If the tests are duplicated then we should remove, if not then we should rewrite them quickly to use grpc

[julienrbrt]

Can we make them non E2E? and put them here if they do not exist: https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/c8ab555174ef5b1f8557b80361d8b83754f62f6a/x/feegrant/keeper/grpc_query_test.go
It would be great to delete the E2E and improve existing grpc tests instead of adding new ones at a different place.

[JeancarloBarrios]

I was thinking that those ones are mocked, but If we don't think is necessary for them to be in e2e I will delete them.

[likhita-809]

I think we are already testing them in feegrant's grpc_query_test.go, but the only difference is we are using QueryRequests there and RPC URLs here, maybe we could improve the tests there instead of adding them in E2E tests

[julienrbrt]

🚀

[likhita-809]

lgtm