-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(x/bank): move validate basic checks to msg server #15782
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d5849ab
refactor(x/bank): move validate basic checks to msg server
atheeshp 86c8852
remove unreachable test cases
atheeshp 21e40e2
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:cosmos/cosmos-sdk into ap/remove-ba…
atheeshp cb17a93
fix tests
atheeshp a26a8b8
review changes
atheeshp 4401561
review changes
atheeshp 4a3db9d
Merge branch 'main' into ap/remove-bank-validatebasic
mergify[bot] 3c6fdb0
Merge branch 'main' into ap/remove-bank-validatebasic
julienrbrt 2859752
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:cosmos/cosmos-sdk into ap/remove-ba…
atheeshp 198fa05
Merge branch 'main' into ap/remove-bank-validatebasic
julienrbrt 5715f82
Merge branch 'ap/remove-bank-validatebasic' of github.com:cosmos/cosm…
atheeshp c8bea60
Merge branch 'main' into ap/remove-bank-validatebasic
atheeshp d021856
Merge branch 'main' into ap/remove-bank-validatebasic
julienrbrt 9ae8a17
Merge branch 'main' into ap/remove-bank-validatebasic
atheeshp 1f5e576
fix lint
atheeshp 922e00a
Merge branch 'ap/remove-bank-validatebasic' of github.com:cosmos/cosm…
atheeshp 166f47c
lint
atheeshp 0f8f38f
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:cosmos/cosmos-sdk into ap/remove-ba…
atheeshp File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This case executes in endblocker after proposal pass, cannot catch here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With the removal of validate basic, is there a way to verify the proposal message is correct before its execution? That's a pretty unhandy drawback imho.
We need to find a way to improve submit proposal CLI for avoiding that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
user should be simulating to verify, isnt this enough?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For other messages, yes, absolutely, but not for messages with nested messages (like gov or group proposal) I do not think it will work.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just talked with atheesh, We think we should extend simulations to support nested messages because more and more apps are using nested messages with delayed execution
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This makes sense and would solve the issue indeed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#15809