fix: Divergence on toolType/toolName naming convention

[brunoalvesdefaria]

• Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

• The commit message follows our guidelines
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

• What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)

  • Bug fix with divergent toolType/toolName being added to event data.
  • Updated documentation with toolName as being the new attribute to be used.
  • Added comments to the code with deprecation notice of toolType attribute.

• What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)

  • Some tools/manipulators were triggering events with toolType attribute and others with toolName attribute.

• What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

  • Until the toolType attribute is removed, all the event data are including both toolType and toolName attributes.

• Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

  • No, but it introduce a deprecation notice for the usage of toolType attribute.
  • It will be a breaking change when toolType is removed for good.

• Other information:

  • toolType naming is now going to be used to categorize types of tools (e.g. general, annotation, stack, segmentation, etc.)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1216 into master will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 34.48%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1216      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   18.71%   18.71%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         286      286              
  Lines        8582     8583       +1     
  Branches     1459     1459              
==========================================
  Hits         1606     1606              
- Misses       5783     5784       +1     
  Partials     1193     1193              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...ispatchers/mouseEventHandlers/addNewMeasurement.js	6.25% <ø> (ø)
...ispatchers/touchEventHandlers/addNewMeasurement.js	4.00% <ø> (ø)
src/manipulators/moveAllHandles.js	6.89% <ø> (ø)
src/manipulators/moveHandle.js	6.17% <0.00%> (ø)
src/manipulators/moveNewHandle.js	5.55% <ø> (ø)
...rc/stateManagement/frameOfReferenceStateManager.js	10.34% <0.00%> (ø)
src/stateManagement/stackSpecificStateManager.js	7.40% <0.00%> (ø)
src/stateManagement/toolState.js	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/store/setToolMode.js	21.89% <ø> (ø)
src/tools/annotation/AngleTool.js	0.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 13 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3fb6cf6...905ed17. Read the comment docs.

[dannyrb]

Assuming the demo plays nicely, it builds, and tests pass, then this should help clarify things quite a bit! I did call out when renaming that may not be correct that we should double check.

[dannyrb]

🎉 This PR is included in version 4.15.0 🎉

The release is available on:

• npm package (@latest dist-tag)
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

[mikehazell]

This PR resolved #991