-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 198
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
libpriv/postprocess: also delete semanage lock files #1002
Conversation
We don't need those in the tree, so let's nuke them. This also fixes subtle compatibility issues between hardlinks and lock files (see coreos#999).
f236479
to
0521802
Compare
The tester went for down for a sec, it should be back online now. |
@rh-atomic-bot retry |
@rh-atomic-bot retry |
💔 Test failed - status-atomicjenkins |
Needs to handle
|
Fixup to handle
Although, we also go through this path during layering, right? |
Yep, though it might be nice to start thinking about putting the treefile data in the commit so we can do things like match |
💔 Test failed - status-atomicjenkins |
@rh-atomic-bot retry |
@rh-atomic-bot retry |
☀️ Test successful - status-atomicjenkins |
These shouldn't be in the package; the fact that they're empty files causes libostree to hardlink them which breaks things. See also coreos#1002
These shouldn't be in the package; the fact that they're empty files causes libostree to hardlink them which breaks things. See also coreos#1002
These shouldn't be in the package; the fact that they're empty files causes libostree to hardlink them which breaks things. See also coreos#1002
These shouldn't be in the package; the fact that they're empty files causes libostree to hardlink them which breaks things. See also coreos#1002
We don't need those in the tree, so let's nuke them. This also fixes
subtle compatibility issues between hardlinks and lock files (see #999).