Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[rawhide] upgrade yields incorrect labels on SELinux modules files #1806

Open
dustymabe opened this issue Oct 3, 2024 · 8 comments
Open

[rawhide] upgrade yields incorrect labels on SELinux modules files #1806

dustymabe opened this issue Oct 3, 2024 · 8 comments
Labels
pipeline failure This issue or pull request is derived from CI failures rawhide Issues that uniquely pertain to rawhide

Comments

@dustymabe
Copy link
Member

This one is odd. It appears upgrading FCOS in rawhide right now gives us files that don't match the pre-upgraded system policy or the post-upgraded system policy:

$ cosa buildfetch --build=42.20240928.91.0 --artifact=qemu && cosa decompress --build=42.20240928.91.0

$ cosa run --build=42.20240928.91.0
Fedora CoreOS 42.20240928.91.0
Tracker: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker
Discuss: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/tag/coreos

Last login: Thu Oct  3 14:01:38 2024
[core@cosa-devsh ~]$
[core@cosa-devsh ~]$ sudo ls -ldZ /etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules
drwx------. 6 root root system_u:object_r:semanage_store_t:s0 55 Aug  1  2022 /etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules
[core@cosa-devsh ~]$ sudo restorecon -vn /etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules
[core@cosa-devsh ~]$ sudo rpm-ostree upgrade
Pulling manifest: ostree-remote-image:fedora:docker://quay.io/fedora/fedora-coreos:rawhide
Importing: ostree-remote-image:fedora:docker://quay.io/fedora/fedora-coreos:rawhide (digest: sha256:74069e8f769367d95c3567fc1530dd5e01c286477df13020d6cd010c577c5358)
ostree chunk layers already present: 27
ostree chunk layers needed: 24 (452.6 MB)
...
Staging deployment... done
Upgraded:
  bootupd 0.2.21-1.fc42 -> 0.2.23-1.fc42
  ca-certificates 2024.2.69_v8.0.401-1.fc42 -> 2024.2.69_v8.0.401-2.fc42
  coreutils 9.5-9.fc42 -> 9.5-10.fc42
  coreutils-common 9.5-9.fc42 -> 9.5-10.fc42
  kernel 6.12.0-0.rc0.20240926git11a299a7933e.13.fc42 -> 6.12.0-0.rc0.20240927git075dbe9f6e3c.14.fc42
  kernel-core 6.12.0-0.rc0.20240926git11a299a7933e.13.fc42 -> 6.12.0-0.rc0.20240927git075dbe9f6e3c.14.fc42
  kernel-modules 6.12.0-0.rc0.20240926git11a299a7933e.13.fc42 -> 6.12.0-0.rc0.20240927git075dbe9f6e3c.14.fc42
  kernel-modules-core 6.12.0-0.rc0.20240926git11a299a7933e.13.fc42 -> 6.12.0-0.rc0.20240927git075dbe9f6e3c.14.fc42
Removed:
  lld-libs-18.1.8-2.fc41.x86_64
  llvm-libs-18.1.8-2.fc41.x86_64
Added:
  lld18-libs-18.1.7-3.fc42.x86_64
  llvm18-libs-18.1.7-5.fc42.x86_64
Run "systemctl reboot" to start a reboot

[core@cosa-devsh ~]$ sudo su -
[root@cosa-devsh ~]# ls -ldZ /sysroot/ostree/deploy/fedora-coreos/deploy/*.0/etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules
drwx------. 6 root root system_u:object_r:semanage_store_t:s0 55 Aug  1  2022 /sysroot/ostree/deploy/fedora-coreos/deploy/7cbaa774e4dbb53022db38358e16f4b38b0be0f236b950bd20ffc2d9a12f4d66.0/etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules
drwx------. 6 root root system_u:object_r:semanage_store_t:s0 55 Oct  3 14:04 /sysroot/ostree/deploy/fedora-coreos/deploy/f64ade6708536ef6cdc686a2bd0d586a64ebb9ae9277b73523604b5f7539a7e0.0/etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules
[root@cosa-devsh ~]# reboot
...
...
...
Fedora CoreOS 42.20241002.91.0
Tracker: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker
Discuss: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/tag/coreos

Last login: Thu Oct  3 14:09:13 2024
[core@cosa-devsh ~]$ sudo ls -ldZ /etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules
drwx------. 6 root root system_u:object_r:selinux_config_t:s0 55 Oct  3 14:09 /etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules
[root@cosa-devsh ~]# ls -ldZ /sysroot/ostree/deploy/fedora-coreos/deploy/*.0/etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules
drwx------. 6 root root system_u:object_r:semanage_store_t:s0 55 Aug  1  2022 /sysroot/ostree/deploy/fedora-coreos/deploy/7cbaa774e4dbb53022db38358e16f4b38b0be0f236b950bd20ffc2d9a12f4d66.0/etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules
drwx------. 6 root root system_u:object_r:selinux_config_t:s0 55 Oct  3 14:09 /sysroot/ostree/deploy/fedora-coreos/deploy/f64ade6708536ef6cdc686a2bd0d586a64ebb9ae9277b73523604b5f7539a7e0.0/etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules

So something to do with the finalization that happens on reboot after the new deployment has been downloaded and applied?

[root@cosa-devsh ~]# rpm -q rpm-ostree ostree
rpm-ostree-2024.8-1.fc42.x86_64
ostree-2024.8-1.fc42.x86_64
@dustymabe dustymabe added rawhide Issues that uniquely pertain to rawhide pipeline failure This issue or pull request is derived from CI failures labels Oct 3, 2024
@dustymabe
Copy link
Member Author

Note if I just boot 42.20240928.91.0 or 42.20241002.91.0 without doing an upgrade then the files aren't labeled incorrectly.

@travier
Copy link
Member

travier commented Oct 3, 2024

This is indeed unexpected: https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy/blob/04bacae728b228b10e2a724dd5742e4bfec8aedb/policy/modules/system/selinuxutil.fc#L13

@travier
Copy link
Member

travier commented Oct 3, 2024

Maybe there is a missing type transition rule as the parent dir is selinux_config_t: https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy/blob/04bacae728b228b10e2a724dd5742e4bfec8aedb/policy/modules/system/selinuxutil.fc#L6

@dustymabe
Copy link
Member Author

@travier it's somehow triggered by upgrade, though, because images booted without being upgraded have the correct labels

@dustymabe
Copy link
Member Author

ok it looks like it's /usr/bin/ostree admin finalize-staged that's causing this:

[root@cosa-devsh ~]# ls -ldZ /sysroot/ostree/deploy/fedora-coreos/deploy/*.0/etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules
drwx------. 6 root root system_u:object_r:semanage_store_t:s0 55 Aug  1  2022 /sysroot/ostree/deploy/fedora-coreos/deploy/7cbaa774e4dbb53022db38358e16f4b38b0be0f236b950bd20ffc2d9a12f4d66.0/etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules
drwx------. 6 root root system_u:object_r:semanage_store_t:s0 55 Oct  3 14:29 /sysroot/ostree/deploy/fedora-coreos/deploy/9b4668adcbf84503dead8b1c2fb328381e93491f25081230da50da9ec77e8bfe.0/etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules

[root@cosa-devsh ~]# /usr/bin/ostree admin finalize-staged
Copying /etc changes: 6 modified, 0 removed, 39 added
Bootloader updated; bootconfig swap: yes; bootversion: boot.0.1, deployment count change: 1
[root@cosa-devsh ~]# ls -ldZ /sysroot/ostree/deploy/fedora-coreos/deploy/*.0/etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules
drwx------. 6 root root system_u:object_r:semanage_store_t:s0 55 Aug  1  2022 /sysroot/ostree/deploy/fedora-coreos/deploy/7cbaa774e4dbb53022db38358e16f4b38b0be0f236b950bd20ffc2d9a12f4d66.0/etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules
drwx------. 6 root root system_u:object_r:selinux_config_t:s0 55 Oct  3 14:31 /sysroot/ostree/deploy/fedora-coreos/deploy/9b4668adcbf84503dead8b1c2fb328381e93491f25081230da50da9ec77e8bfe.0/etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules

@jlebon
Copy link
Member

jlebon commented Oct 3, 2024 •
edited
Loading

This is from the semodule -N --refresh call ostree does during finalization which should normally be a no-op in this case. I booted the same rawhide build and did:

root@cosa-devsh:~# restorecon -rvn /etc/selinux
root@cosa-devsh:~# semodule -N --refresh
root@cosa-devsh:~# restorecon -rvn /etc/selinux
Would relabel /etc/selinux/targeted/active/booleans.local from system_u:object_r:selinux_config_t:s0 to system_u:object_r:semanage_store_t:s0
...

cc @WOnder93

I guess... let's file a bugzilla against policycoreutils to start?

@dustymabe
Copy link
Member Author

Ran a bisect on this in rawhide with a test that does

sudo semodule -N --refresh && sudo find /etc/selinux/targeted/active/modules -maxdepth 0 -context "system_u:object_r:selinux_config_t:s0" -delete

Note the delete will fail because it's a read-only filesystem and thus the test will fail if anything is found..

The results:

BISECT TEST RESULTS:
Last known good build: 42.20240911.91.0
First known bad build: 42.20240914.91.0

The package set in that changeset is:

ostree diff commit from: 3a8acb2a5b7971084404216fb7c1d0282f626c7186618c361aa4545fbe3493b8
ostree diff commit to:   766159d55230282690a7e11cbe836fe06b26c62d846f9ba256bd4e9489e9e7d3
Upgraded:
  bootc 0.1.15-1.fc42 -> 0.1.16-1.fc42
  conmon 2:2.1.12-2.fc41 -> 2:2.1.12-3.fc42
  container-selinux 2:2.232.1-2.fc41 -> 2:2.233.0-1.fc42
  crun 1.15-2.fc41 -> 1.17-1.fc42
  crun-wasm 1.15-2.fc41 -> 1.17-1.fc42
  curl 8.9.1-3.fc42 -> 8.10.0-1.fc42
  gnutls 3.8.7-2.fc42 -> 3.8.7-4.fc42
  kbd 2.6.4-4.fc41 -> 2.6.4-5.fc42
  kbd-legacy 2.6.4-4.fc41 -> 2.6.4-5.fc42
  kbd-misc 2.6.4-4.fc41 -> 2.6.4-5.fc42
  kernel 6.11.0-0.rc7.56.fc42 -> 6.11.0-0.rc7.20240913git196145c606d0.60.fc42
  kernel-core 6.11.0-0.rc7.56.fc42 -> 6.11.0-0.rc7.20240913git196145c606d0.60.fc42
  kernel-modules 6.11.0-0.rc7.56.fc42 -> 6.11.0-0.rc7.20240913git196145c606d0.60.fc42
  kernel-modules-core 6.11.0-0.rc7.56.fc42 -> 6.11.0-0.rc7.20240913git196145c606d0.60.fc42
  libcurl-minimal 8.9.1-3.fc42 -> 8.10.0-1.fc42
  libgcc 14.2.1-2.fc42 -> 14.2.1-3.fc42
  libldb 2:4.21.0-7.fc42 -> 2:4.21.0-9.fc42
  libselinux 3.7-5.fc41 -> 3.7-6.fc42
  libselinux-utils 3.7-5.fc41 -> 3.7-6.fc42
  libsemanage 3.7-2.fc41 -> 3.7-3.fc42
  libsepol 3.7-2.fc41 -> 3.7-3.fc42
  libsmbclient 2:4.21.0-7.fc42 -> 2:4.21.0-9.fc42
  libstdc++ 14.2.1-2.fc42 -> 14.2.1-3.fc42
  libwbclient 2:4.21.0-7.fc42 -> 2:4.21.0-9.fc42
  microcode_ctl 2:2.1-64.fc42 -> 2:2.1-65.fc42
  openssl 1:3.2.2-5.fc41 -> 1:3.2.2-8.fc42
  openssl-libs 1:3.2.2-5.fc41 -> 1:3.2.2-8.fc42
  rpm 4.19.93-1.fc42 -> 4.19.94-1.fc42
  rpm-libs 4.19.93-1.fc42 -> 4.19.94-1.fc42
  rpm-plugin-selinux 4.19.93-1.fc42 -> 4.19.94-1.fc42
  samba-client-libs 2:4.21.0-7.fc42 -> 2:4.21.0-9.fc42
  samba-common 2:4.21.0-7.fc42 -> 2:4.21.0-9.fc42
  samba-common-libs 2:4.21.0-7.fc42 -> 2:4.21.0-9.fc42
  selinux-policy 41.16-1.fc42 -> 41.17-1.fc42
  selinux-policy-targeted 41.16-1.fc42 -> 41.17-1.fc42
  zlib-ng-compat 2.1.7-2.fc41 -> 2.1.7-3.fc42

@dustymabe
Copy link
Member Author

I guess... let's file a bugzilla against policycoreutils to start?

opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316388 to start the conversation

@dustymabe dustymabe mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2024
Merged
@HuijingHei HuijingHei mentioned this issue Oct 8, 2024
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
pipeline failure This issue or pull request is derived from CI failures rawhide Issues that uniquely pertain to rawhide
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@dustymabe @jlebon @travier