Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

manifests: enable cliwrap on Fedora 40+ #2858

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2024

Conversation

jlebon
Copy link
Member

@jlebon jlebon commented Feb 16, 2024

As part of the bootable containers effort, we want to put emphasis on a consistent experience when deriving images. A big part of that is being able to type dnf install -y ... in one's Containerfile.

Let's turn on cliwrap for this. This was previously agreed[1], but we ended never shipping it since there was a less invasive way to test it.[2] Here, we bundle it as part of the Fedora 40 rebase. This will naturally allow it to bake in branched and next for a while before making it to stable.

Eventually, once dnf5 is ready, it could take on this role (including package layering on the client-side), at which point we will no longer need to wrap it.

jlebon added a commit to jlebon/os that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2024
As part of the bootable containers effort, we want to put emphasis on a
consistent experience when deriving images. A big part of that is being
able to type `dnf install -y ...` in one's `Containerfile`.

Let's turn on cliwrap for this. This matches the change in FCOS.[[1]]

[1]: coreos/fedora-coreos-config#2858
@jlebon
Copy link
Member Author

jlebon commented Feb 16, 2024

Also done in RHCOS in openshift/os#1442.

As part of the bootable containers effort, we want to put emphasis on a
consistent experience when deriving images. A big part of that is being
able to type `dnf install -y ...` in one's `Containerfile`.

Let's turn on cliwrap for this. This was previously agreed[[1]], but
we ended never shipping it since there was a less invasive way to test
it.[[2]] Here, we bundle it as part of the Fedora 40 rebase. This will
naturally allow it to bake in `branched` and `next` for a while before
making it to `stable`.

Eventually, once dnf5 is ready, it could take on this role (including
package layering on the client-side), at which point we will no longer
need to wrap it.

[1]: coreos#830 (comment)
[2]: coreos#830 (comment)
@jlebon
Copy link
Member Author

jlebon commented Feb 22, 2024

Rebased! As per coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker#730 (comment), I think this is ready for review now.

Copy link
Member

@dustymabe dustymabe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jlebon jlebon merged commit 1cfbd77 into coreos:testing-devel Feb 26, 2024
3 checks passed
@jlebon jlebon deleted the pr/cliwrap branch February 26, 2024 17:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants