Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Work around supermin + kernel + ext2 filesystem bug #907

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2019

Conversation

jlebon
Copy link
Member

@jlebon jlebon commented Nov 8, 2019

See all the details in:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770304

But the TL;DR is: there seems to be an issue in the way supermin creates
the root ext2 filesystem which became a hard error in 5.3.8. So for now,
let's just keep pulling 5.3.7.

See all the details in:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770304

But the TL;DR is: there seems to be an issue in the way supermin creates
the root ext2 filesystem which became a hard error in 5.3.8. So for now,
let's just keep pulling 5.3.7.
@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

Oh my god

@jlebon jlebon mentioned this pull request Nov 8, 2019
Copy link
Member

@cgwalters cgwalters left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, I also checked that we are getting this kernel in the build.

But having CI pass will tell us for sure!

@cgwalters cgwalters merged commit 54ce275 into coreos:master Nov 8, 2019
@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

I can only imagine how painful this was to debug...thank you so much for diving into it!

jcajka pushed a commit to jcajka/coreos-assembler that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2020
Adds a test that runs on all currently supported distributions that
enables a systemd service that already exists on the machine to test
that systemd-presets is ran.

Fixes coreos#907
@jlebon jlebon deleted the pr/work-around-supermin-ext2-bug branch July 6, 2020 20:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants