Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: update to F34: pass enforced short-name mode #9800

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

vrothberg
Copy link
Member

Continuation of #9554 to help move things forward.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 24, 2021
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Mar 24, 2021

Looks like you included a whole bunch of PRs with this?

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

vrothberg commented Mar 24, 2021

Looks like you included a whole bunch of PRs with this?

That's intentional (see commit message): it's a continuation of the PR to run F34.

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

Oh, more things were pulled in. Those commits are in master already. Will do an exact rebase with the next push.

In contrast to `assert.NoError`, `require.NoError` treats mismatches
fatally which in many cases is necessary to prevent subsequent checks
from segfaulting.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
Defer cleaning up the test artifacts as early as possible.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
@vrothberg vrothberg force-pushed the shortname-farts branch 2 times, most recently from cb66978 to 73ba8e7 Compare March 24, 2021 12:50
@cevich
Copy link
Member

cevich commented Mar 24, 2021

@vrothberg I appreciate your help here, and word-of-warning: There are likely to be many more stumbling tests past this one. Since F34 just started official beta, I'll also likely be rolling freshly built images into #9554. Including my commits here is fine for testing, but come merge-time I would suggest not including them. I'll pick them up by rebase in #9554 eventually.

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

@cevich, agreed. I'll continue here trying to get the unit tests to pass. Guess we need to go step by step.

@vrothberg vrothberg force-pushed the shortname-farts branch 3 times, most recently from 0a99e7f to d89db34 Compare March 24, 2021 18:12
Since some unit tests use "busybox", we need to point it to some alias
if we want it to pass CI on F34 where we're running in enforced mode.

Furthermore, make sure that the registries.conf can actually be
overridden in the code.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
@vrothberg vrothberg closed this Mar 25, 2021
@vrothberg vrothberg deleted the shortname-farts branch March 25, 2021 15:16
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants