Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix containers list/prune http api filter behaviour #9773

Conversation

jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor

@jmguzik jmguzik commented Mar 20, 2021

The problem described in #9711 and followed by #9758 affects
containers as well. When user provides wrong filter input, error
message should occur, not fallback to full list/prune command.
This change fixes the issue. Additionally, there are error message
fixes for docker http api compat.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Guzik [email protected]

@jmguzik jmguzik force-pushed the containers-prune-filters-http-api branch from 5044eb6 to 45c708a Compare March 20, 2021 20:32
The problem described in containers#9711 and followed by containers#9758 affects
containers as well. When user provides wrong filter input, error
message should occur, not fallback to full list/prune command.
This change fixes the issue. Additionally, there are error message
fixes for docker http api compat.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Guzik <[email protected]>
@jmguzik jmguzik force-pushed the containers-prune-filters-http-api branch from 45c708a to 907b34c Compare March 20, 2021 21:56
@zhangguanzhang
Copy link
Collaborator

also need update the doc. otherwise LGTM

@jmguzik
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmguzik commented Mar 21, 2021

also need update the doc. otherwise LGTM

There is no functional change, just fix of the not working functionality. Which docs i need to update in that case?
I think that the documentation (https://docs.podman.io/en/latest/_static/api.html) states, the feature is working.

@jwhonce
Copy link
Member

jwhonce commented Mar 22, 2021

LGTM

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jmguzik, Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 22, 2021
@Luap99
Copy link
Member

Luap99 commented Mar 22, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 22, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit d0bd775 into containers:master Mar 22, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants