Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Respect NanoCpus in Compat Create #9607

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2021

Conversation

mheon
Copy link
Member

@mheon mheon commented Mar 3, 2021

The NanoCpus field in HostConfig was not wired up. It conflicts with CPU period and quota (it hard-codes period to a specific value and then sets the user-specified value as Quota).

Fixes #9523

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mheon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 3, 2021
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Mar 3, 2021

LGTM

@@ -263,3 +263,12 @@ t GET containers/json 200 \
.[0].Ports[0].Type="tcp"

podman stop bar

# Test CPU limit (NanoCPUs)
t POST containers/create '"Image":"'$IMAGE'","HostConfig":{"NanpCpus":500000}' 201 \
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typo in NanpCpus?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch... I was trying to figure out why this wasn't being set.

The NanoCpus field in HostConfig was not wired up. It conflicts
with CPU period and quota (it hard-codes period to a specific
value and then sets the user-specified value as Quota).

Fixes containers#9523

Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <[email protected]>
@mheon
Copy link
Member Author

mheon commented Mar 4, 2021

APIv2 test is green, this looks like CI will pass. @containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Mar 4, 2021

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 4, 2021
@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Mar 4, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 4, 2021
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Mar 4, 2021

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 4, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4e5cc6a into containers:master Mar 4, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

REST API does honor NanoCpus in HostConfig
6 participants