Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix an issue where copyup could fail with ENOENT #9383

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2021

Conversation

mheon
Copy link
Member

@mheon mheon commented Feb 15, 2021

This one is rather bizarre because it triggers only on some systems. I've included a CI test, for example, but I'm 99% sure we use images in CI that have volumes over empty directories, and the earlier patch to change copy-up implementation passed CI without complaint.

I can reproduce this on a stock F33 VM, but that's the only place I have been able to see it.

Regardless, the issue: under certain as-yet-unidentified environmental conditions, the copier.Get method will return an ENOENT attempting to stream a directory that is empty. Work around this by avoiding the copy altogether in this case.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mheon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 15, 2021
@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM
assuming happy tests

@edigaryev
Copy link
Contributor

Care to add a simple test case from #9393?

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

A rebase should turn CI green

This one is rather bizarre because it triggers only on some
systems. I've included a CI test, for example, but I'm 99% sure
we use images in CI that have volumes over empty directories, and
the earlier patch to change copy-up implementation passed CI
without complaint.

I can reproduce this on a stock F33 VM, but that's the only place
I have been able to see it.

Regardless, the issue: under certain as-yet-unidentified
environmental conditions, the copier.Get method will return an
ENOENT attempting to stream a directory that is empty. Work
around this by avoiding the copy altogether in this case.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <[email protected]>
@mheon
Copy link
Member Author

mheon commented Feb 16, 2021

Rebased. I don't think we have any need of further tests - as I said, upstream CI doesn't catch this one, and we already have tests that use images with volumes.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Feb 17, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 17, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit d48f4a0 into containers:master Feb 17, 2021
@ondrejbudai
Copy link

Will this be backported to RHEL 8.4? We're hitting the same issue in our CI.

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Feb 18, 2021

Yes

@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants