Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix broken podman generate systemd --new with pods #9375

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2021

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented Feb 15, 2021

The unit generation accidentally escaped the %t in the pod id file path.
This is a regression caused by #9178. This was not caught by the tests
because the test itself was wrong. It used a full path instead of the
systemd variable %t like the actual code does.

Fixes #9373

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 15, 2021
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Other than the nit LGTM

pkg/systemd/generate/containers.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM, but tests are not at all happy.

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Feb 15, 2021

LGTM

The unit generation accidentally escaped the %t in the pod id file path.
This is a regression caused by containers#9178. This was not caught by the tests
because the test itself was wrong. It used a full path instead of the
systemd variable %t like the actual code does.

Fixes containers#9373

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 16, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 16, 2021
@Luap99
Copy link
Member Author

Luap99 commented Feb 16, 2021

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 16, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ac9a048 into containers:master Feb 16, 2021
@Luap99 Luap99 deleted the fix-9373 branch February 19, 2021 10:41
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The podman generate systemd command generated the wrong file.
6 participants