Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Endpoint that lists containers does not return correct Status value #9173

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2021
Merged

Conversation

mlegenovic
Copy link
Contributor

Eclipse and Intellij Docker plugin determines the state of the
container via the Status field, returned from /containers/json call.
Podman always returns empty string, and because of that, both IDEs
show the wrong state of the container.

Signed-off-by: Milivoje Legenovic [email protected]

} else {
status = "Unknown"
}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mlegenovic
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do not ask me why they use Status field to determine container state, and not State field which is much more suitable.

Eclipse and Intellij Docker plugin determines the state of the
container via the Status field, returned from /containers/json call.
Podman always returns empty string, and because of that, both IDEs
show the wrong state of the container.

Signed-off-by: Milivoje Legenovic <[email protected]>
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Feb 1, 2021

LGTM
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mheon, mlegenovic

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 1, 2021
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
Thanks!

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 1, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit b045c17 into containers:master Feb 1, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants