Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleanup bindings for image pull #9133

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2021

Conversation

rhatdan
Copy link
Member

@rhatdan rhatdan commented Jan 27, 2021

Remove bindings that are not handled over the API.

Leaving this one to not use image pull, since this would
break progress handling. We should revisit this in the
future.

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh [email protected]

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 27, 2021
options.WithVariant(opts.Variant).WithPassword(opts.Password).WithPullPolicy(opts.PullPolicy)
options.WithAllTags(opts.AllTags).WithAuthfile(opts.Authfile).WithArch(opts.Arch).WithOS(opts.OS)
options.WithVariant(opts.Variant).WithPassword(opts.Password)
options.WithQuiet(opts.Quiet).WithUsername(opts.Username)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't quiet be client side? I see no reason we shouldn't always send the info - the client can just decide not to print it

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Currently this is being handled on the server side. Seemed to risky to fix this now.

Remove bindings that are not handled over the API.

Leaving this one to not use image pull, since this would
break progress handling.  We should revisit this in the
future.

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <[email protected]>
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member Author

rhatdan commented Jan 28, 2021

@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL
This is ready to go in.

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@QiWang19 QiWang19 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rhatdan rhatdan added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 29, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0fe3d43 into containers:master Jan 29, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants