Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

System tests: cover gaps from the last month #9091

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 25, 2021

Conversation

edsantiago
Copy link
Member

The 'build' test is intended as a fix for #8679, in which
'podman build' does not mount secrets from mounts.conf.
Unfortunately, as of this writing, 'podman build' does
not pass the --default-mounts-file option to buildah,
so there's no reasonable way to test this path. Still,
we can at least confirm /run/secrets on 'podman run'.

The /sys thing is related to #8949: RHEL8, rootless, cgroups v1.
It's just a workaround to get gating tests to pass on RHEL.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago [email protected]

- stop: test --all and --ignore (containers#9051)
- build: test /run/secrets (containers#8679, but see below)
- sensitive mount points: deal with 'stat' failures
- selinux: confirm useful diagnostics on unknown labels (containers#8946)

The 'build' test is intended as a fix for containers#8679, in which
'podman build' does not mount secrets from mounts.conf.
Unfortunately, as of this writing, 'podman build' does
not pass the --default-mounts-file option to buildah,
so there's no reasonable way to test this path. Still,
we can at least confirm /run/secrets on 'podman run'.

The /sys thing is related to containers#8949: RHEL8, rootless, cgroups v1.
It's just a workaround to get gating tests to pass on RHEL.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: edsantiago

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 25, 2021
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Jan 25, 2021

LGTM

1 similar comment
@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/hold
hold for happy tests

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 25, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 25, 2021
@edsantiago
Copy link
Member Author

Yay! Releasing hold so @rhatdan can proceed with #9094

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 25, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit b902ad9 into containers:master Jan 25, 2021
@edsantiago edsantiago deleted the more_bats branch January 25, 2021 22:23
edsantiago added a commit to edsantiago/libpod that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2021
Backport one component of containers#9091 in hopes of fixing RHEL8
gating test failures.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants