Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "ginkgo: install on demand via go get -u" #9031

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2021

Conversation

vrothberg
Copy link
Member

This reverts commit de05e58.

Running go get -u will change the local Go module causing CI to fail
as the local git tree is being changed. Reverting the change for now
until we have a better idea.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg [email protected]

@giuseppe @Luap99 PTAL

This reverts commit de05e58.

Running `go get -u` will change the local Go module causing CI to fail
as the local git tree is being changed.  Reverting the change for now
until we have a better idea.

Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 20, 2021
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

For the record: an example CI failur is https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6667608495751168

Not sure why that didn't happen in the PR.

Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@saschagrunert saschagrunert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: saschagrunert, vrothberg

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [saschagrunert,vrothberg]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Jan 20, 2021

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 20, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 20, 2021
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 20, 2021
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 20, 2021
@vrothberg
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 20, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 7d024a2 into containers:master Jan 20, 2021
@vrothberg vrothberg deleted the revert-ginkgo branch January 20, 2021 12:18
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants