Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

play kube: set entrypoint when interpreting Command #8961

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2021

Conversation

rhatdan
Copy link
Member

@rhatdan rhatdan commented Jan 13, 2021

We now set Entrypoint when interpeting the image Entrypoint (or yaml.Command)
and Command when interpreting image Cmd (or yaml.Args)

This change is kind of breaking because now checking Config.Cmd won't return
the full command, but only the {cmd,args}.

Adapt the tests to this change as well

Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh [email protected]

We now set Entrypoint when interpeting the image Entrypoint (or yaml.Command)
and Command when interpreting image Cmd (or yaml.Args)

This change is kind of breaking because now checking Config.Cmd won't return
the full command, but only the {cmd,args}.

Adapt the tests to this change as well

Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 13, 2021
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member Author

rhatdan commented Jan 13, 2021

Replaces: #8808

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member Author

rhatdan commented Jan 13, 2021

@haircommander PTAL

@haircommander
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM

@haircommander
Copy link
Collaborator

thanks for carrying this

@jwhonce
Copy link
Member

jwhonce commented Jan 13, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 13, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 9473dda into containers:master Jan 13, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 23, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants