Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Podman image bindings for 3.0 #8715

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2020

Conversation

baude
Copy link
Member

@baude baude commented Dec 14, 2020

Begin the migration of the image bindings for podman 3.0. this includes
the use of options for each binding. build was intentionally not
converted as I believe it needs more discussion before migration.
specifically, the build options themselves.

also noteworthly is that the remove image and remove images bindings
were merged into one. the remove images (or batch remove) has one
downside in that the errors return no longer adhere to http return
codes. this should be discussed and reimplemented in subsequent code.

Signed-off-by: baude [email protected]

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: baude

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 14, 2020
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if we could remove the bindings tests. As the bindings are used the remote client we are testing the bindings extensively. Removing them would reduce maintenance burden and save some CI cycles.

pkg/api/handlers/libpod/images.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/bindings/images/pull.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/bindings/images/diff.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/bindings/images/rm.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/bindings/images/types_diffoptions.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@baude baude force-pushed the bindings3images branch 5 times, most recently from 6a22ea8 to 0a5d6a1 Compare December 15, 2020 21:24
Begin the migration of the image bindings for podman 3.0.  this includes
the use of options for each binding.  build was intentionally not
converted as I believe it needs more discussion before migration.
specifically, the build options themselves.

also noteworthly is that the remove image and remove images bindings
were merged into one.  the remove images (or batch remove) has one
downside in that the errors return no longer adhere to http return
codes.  this should be discussed and reimplemented in subsequent code.

Signed-off-by: baude <[email protected]>
// Note: we have to verify if skipped is false.
if options.SkipTLSVerify != nil {
params.Del("SkipTLSVerify")
params.Set("tlsVerify", strconv.FormatBool(!options.GetSkipTLSVerify()))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like you do this tls check in a number of places. Would it make sense to do a utility function?

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@umohnani8
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 16, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 978c076 into containers:master Dec 16, 2020
@baude baude deleted the bindings3images branch May 18, 2022 15:18
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants