Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change name of imageVolumes in container config JSON #8632

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 7, 2020

Conversation

mheon
Copy link
Member

@mheon mheon commented Dec 7, 2020

Podman pre-1.8 also included a field with this name, which was a String. Podman 2.2.0 added a new field reusing the name but as a Struct. This completely broke JSON decode for pre-1.8 containers in Podman 2.2, resulting in completely broken behavior.

Re-name the JSON field and add a note that the old name should not be re-used to prevent this problem from re-occurring. This will still result in containers from 2.2.0 being broken (specifically, containers with image volumes will have them disappear) but this is the lesser of two evils.

Fixes #8613

Podman pre-1.8 also included a field with this name, which was a
String. Podman 2.2.0 added a new field reusing the name but as a
Struct. This completely broke JSON decode for pre-1.8 containers
in Podman 2.2, resulting in completely broken behavior.

Re-name the JSON field and add a note that the old name should
not be re-used to prevent this problem from re-occurring. This
will still result in containers from 2.2.0 being broken
(specifically, containers with image volumes will have them
disappear) but this is the lesser of two evils.

Fixes containers#8613

Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <[email protected]>
@mheon
Copy link
Member Author

mheon commented Dec 7, 2020

@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL, needed for 2.2.1

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@TomSweeneyRedHat TomSweeneyRedHat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Dec 7, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 7, 2020
@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Dec 7, 2020

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: baude, mheon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 7, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a5ca039 into containers:master Dec 7, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Breaking Change in Container Config will cause JSON Decode Failures with Older Containers
6 participants