Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support Unix timestamps for podman logs --since #8589

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2020
Merged

Support Unix timestamps for podman logs --since #8589

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2020

Conversation

yan12125
Copy link
Contributor

@yan12125 yan12125 commented Dec 4, 2020

To match what podman-logs(1) describes --since: https://github.com/containers/podman/blob/master/docs/source/markdown/podman-logs.1.md#--sincetimestamp.

I discovered this when testing a Python library that uses docker-py to retrieve container logs [1][2]. Under the hood the /containers/{id}/logs API is called with since as a UNIX timestamp [3]. Hopefully this fix can help with compatibility between Podman and docker-py [4].

[1] getmoto/moto#3276
[2] https://github.com/spulec/moto/blob/b6369d62503651a3c614fb2b3ee08c8013b732fc/moto/batch/models.py#L454-L473
[3] https://docs.docker.com/engine/api/v1.40/#operation/ContainerLogs
[4] #5386

To match what podman-logs(1) describes --since

Signed-off-by: Chih-Hsuan Yen <[email protected]>
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Dec 4, 2020

Thanks @yan12125 Nice catch
LGTM
/approve
@containers/podman-maintainers PTAL

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rhatdan, yan12125

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 4, 2020
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 4, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 05df0c5 into containers:master Dec 4, 2020
@yan12125 yan12125 deleted the container-logs-unix-timestamps branch December 4, 2020 11:41
@yan12125
Copy link
Contributor Author

yan12125 commented Dec 4, 2020

Thanks!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants