Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prevent unpredictable results with network create|remove #7943

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 7, 2020

Conversation

baude
Copy link
Member

@baude baude commented Oct 6, 2020

due to a lack of "locking" on cni operations, we could get ourselves in trouble when doing rapid creation or removal of networks. added a simple file lock to deal with the collision and because it is not considered a performent path, use of the file lock should be ok. if proven otherwise in the future, some generic shared memory lock should be implemented for libpod and also used here.

Fixes: #7807

Signed-off-by: baude [email protected]

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: baude

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 6, 2020
pkg/domain/infra/abi/network.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/network/network.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, nice work!

due to a lack of "locking" on cni operations, we could get ourselves in trouble when doing rapid creation or removal of networks.  added a simple file lock to deal with the collision and because it is not considered a performent path, use of the file lock should be ok.  if proven otherwise in the future, some generic shared memory lock should be implemented for libpod and also used here.

moved pkog/network to libpod/network because libpod is now being pulled into the package and it has therefore lost its generic nature. this will make it easier to absorb into libpod as we try to make the network closer to core operations.

Fixes: containers#7807

Signed-off-by: baude <[email protected]>
@baude
Copy link
Member Author

baude commented Oct 7, 2020

merge me

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Oct 7, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 7, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 9ae873e into containers:master Oct 7, 2020
@baude baude deleted the issue7807 branch May 18, 2022 15:19
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

podman network create: race: error reading */conflist: ENOENT
6 participants