Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix handling of CheckRootlessUIDRange #7919

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 5, 2020

Conversation

rhatdan
Copy link
Member

@rhatdan rhatdan commented Oct 5, 2020

If I have multiple ranges of UIDs specified in the /etc/subuid, this check
blows up and incorrectly blocks the use of --user flag.

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh [email protected]

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 5, 2020
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member Author

rhatdan commented Oct 5, 2020

@giuseppe PTAL

If I have multiple ranges of UIDs specified in the /etc/subuid, this check
blows up and incorrectly blocks the use of --user flag.

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@giuseppe giuseppe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: giuseppe, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

total += u.Size
}
if uid > total {
return errors.Errorf("requested user's UID %d is too large for the rootless user namespace", uid)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does it make sense to keep this if statement inside of the for still to have it break ASAP?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No because we need to add all of the ranges together to see if UID is less then. We could check on each loop, I guess to see if it is less then, but that seems to be an optimization with little value. There are not going to be large numbers of ranges in the /etc/subuid file.

@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Oct 5, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 5, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit f48b163 into containers:master Oct 5, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants