Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix compat api privileged and entrypoint code #7877

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2020

Conversation

baude
Copy link
Member

@baude baude commented Oct 1, 2020

when adding /dev to a privileged container using the compatibility API, we need to make sure we dont pass on devices that are simply symlinks. this was already being done by specgen but not on the compat. side.

the entrypoint code that was recently rewritten for the compatibility layer was also failing due to the odd inputs that docker is willing to accept in its json, specifically [] vs "". in the case of the latter, this was being made into a []string with a len of one but no content. this would then be used to prefix the command to run in the container and would fail. For example " ls" vs "ls".

Signed-off-by: baude [email protected]

when adding /dev to a privileged container using the compatibility API, we need to make sure we dont pass on devices that are simply symlinks.  this was already being done by specgen but not on the compat. side.

the entrypoint code that was recently rewritten for the compatibility layer was also failing due to the odd inputs that docker is willing to accept in its json, specifically [] vs "".  in the case of the latter, this was being made into a []string with a len of one but no content.  this would then be used to prefix the command to run in the container and would fail.  For example " ls" vs "ls".

Signed-off-by: baude <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: baude

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 1, 2020
Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Restarted the flake

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Oct 2, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 2, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 0b7b222 into containers:master Oct 2, 2020
@baude baude deleted the compatapipriv branch May 18, 2022 15:19
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 21, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 21, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants