Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

System tests: reenable some skipped tests #7803

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2020

Conversation

edsantiago
Copy link
Member

Also:

  • new test for podman image tree --whatrequires
    (because TIL). Doesn't work with podman-remote.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago [email protected]

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 28, 2020
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 28, 2020

LGTM if the tests pass
/approve

@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

@edsantiago looks like some network tests are failing. I don't believe it's due to these changes.
LGTM
assuming happy tests

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member Author

@TomSweeneyRedHat yep, I'm having a field day filing issues right now

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member Author

New force push. No changes to my tests, but I did piggyback in a fix for a new e2e test that was not properly cleaning up after itself. And, filed two race-condition issues, #7807 and #7808.

test/e2e/network_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
 - pause test: enable when rootless + cgroups v2
   (was previously disabled for all rootless)

 - run --pull: now works with podman-remote
   (in containers#7647, thank you @jwhonce)

 - various other run/volumes tests: try reenabling
   It looks like containers#7195 was fixed (by containers#7451? I'm not
   sure if I'm reading the conversation correctly).
   Anyway, remove all the skip()s on 7195. Only time
   will tell if it's really fixed)

Also:

 - new test for podman image tree --whatrequires
   (because TIL). Doesn't work with podman-remote.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <[email protected]>
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 28, 2020

/approve
/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 28, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 28, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: edsantiago, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 29, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4a7fb62 into containers:master Sep 29, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants