Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix remote logs #7660

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2020
Merged

Fix remote logs #7660

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2020

Conversation

ashley-cui
Copy link
Member

Docker compatibility - logs endpoint does not write stream headers if container has a tty

There are still some issues with logging behavior that affects this, we need to sort that out in the backend before we can know for certain if this is the right fix

Fixes: #7196

Signed-off-by: Ashley Cui [email protected]

Docker compatibility  - logs endpoint does not write stream headers if container has a tty

Signed-off-by: Ashley Cui <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 16, 2020
@ashley-cui
Copy link
Member Author

@vrothberg tagging so you have the link to this PR, thanks for helping me on this

@ashley-cui ashley-cui removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 17, 2020
@ashley-cui ashley-cui changed the title WIP: Fix remote logs Fix remote logs Sep 17, 2020
@ashley-cui
Copy link
Member Author

Update: this should fix remote logs the best we can: adding a tty to a container makes the logs add return carriage symbols, which is a tty quirk, so this should be an accpetable fix. See: moby/moby#37366 (comment)

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 17, 2020

LGTM
@mheon @jwhonce @baude PTAL

Copy link
Member

@vrothberg vrothberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but I want a head not from @baude and/or @jwhonce

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 18, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 18, 2020
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 18, 2020

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ashley-cui, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 18, 2020
@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 18, 2020

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 18, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 5b7509c into containers:master Sep 18, 2020
@ashley-cui ashley-cui deleted the logs branch October 12, 2020 13:59
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[APIv2] Container log not provided
5 participants