Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

system tests: cleanup #7590

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2020
Merged

Conversation

edsantiago
Copy link
Member

  • run tests: better "skip" message for docker-archive test;
    remove FIXME, document that podman-remote doesn't support it

  • run tests: instrument the --conmon-pidfile test in hopes
    of tracking down flake CI flake: podman run --conmon-pidfile: conmon not running? #7580: cross-check pidfile against
    output of 'podman inspect', and add some debug messages
    that will only be seen on test failure.

  • load tests: the pipe test: save and load a temporary tag,
    not $IMAGE. Primary reason is because of podman save --format oci-archive: loses image ID #7371, in which
    'podman load' assigns a new image ID (instead of preserving
    the saved one). This messes with our image management, and
    it turns out to be nonfixable.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago [email protected]

- run tests: better "skip" message for docker-archive test;
  remove FIXME, document that podman-remote doesn't support it

- run tests: instrument the --conmon-pidfile test in hopes
  of tracking down flake containers#7580: cross-check pidfile against
  output of 'podman inspect', and add some debug messages
  that will only be seen on test failure.

- load tests: the pipe test: save and load a temporary tag,
  not $IMAGE. Primary reason is because of containers#7371, in which
  'podman load' assigns a new image ID (instead of preserving
  the saved one). This messes with our image management, and
  it turns out to be nonfixable.

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <[email protected]>
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Sep 10, 2020

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@TomSweeneyRedHat TomSweeneyRedHat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 10, 2020

/lgtm
/hold
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 10, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: edsantiago, rhatdan

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Sep 10, 2020
@edsantiago
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 10, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 10ba232 into containers:master Sep 10, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants