Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't setup the Image/ContainerEngine when calling a cmd with subcmds #7564

Merged

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented Sep 8, 2020

There is no need to setup the image and container engine when calling
a command with subcommands since we only print a usage message.
e.g podman,podman container

This also allows the remote client to show the usage message on
these commands without a running endpoint. I added a test for this.

Run without an endpoint with this commit:

$ bin/podman-remote
Error: missing command 'podman-remote COMMAND'
Try 'podman-remote --help' for more information.

Before:

$ bin/podman-remote
Error: Get "http://d/v1.0.0/libpod../../../_ping": dial unix ///run/user/1000/podman/podman.sock: connect: no such file or directory

There is no need to setup the image and container engine when calling
a command with subcommands since we only print a usage message.
e.g `podman`,`podman container`

This also allows the remote client to show the usage message on
these commands without a running endpoint. I added a test for this.

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

edsantiago commented Sep 8, 2020

On what git commit do you see the ping dial _unix error? On current master @ 54a61e3 I get:

$ ./bin/podman-remote                                                                                                                                 -
Error: missing command 'podman-remote COMMAND'
Try 'podman-remote --help' for more information.
$ ./bin/podman --remote                                                                                                                               -
Error: missing command 'podman COMMAND'
Try 'podman --help' for more information.

UPDATE: never mind. Turns out I had a stray server, sorry!

@Luap99
Copy link
Member Author

Luap99 commented Sep 8, 2020

@edsantiago Do you have the podman service running?

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

Yes, see update. Sorry!

@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Sep 8, 2020

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99, mheon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 8, 2020
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Sep 8, 2020

LGTM

1 similar comment
@TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented Sep 8, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 8, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 814784c into containers:master Sep 8, 2020
@Luap99 Luap99 deleted the remote-subcmds-usage branch November 19, 2020 20:34
@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 24, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants